Peer Review reports
From: Physicians’ views on optimal use and payment system for telemedicine: a qualitative study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Aug 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorenz Harst |
| 24 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 6 Dec 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 27 Dec 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Raes |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 27 Dec 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Jan 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 10 Feb 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorenz Harst |
| 21 Feb 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 9 Mar 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Sarah Raes |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Mar 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Mar 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 20 Mar 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Mar 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Mar 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12913-023-09314-w |
You can find further information about peer review here.