Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies and FCG measures

From: Differences in family caregiver experiences and expectations of end-of-life heart failure care across providers and settings: a systematic literature review

Study

Design

Method

Country

FCG’s Sample

Variable/measures

Hupcey et al. 2010 [44]

Instrumental case studies. Narrative interview

Qualitative

USA

5

Uncertain trajectory of HF; living with a slow decline in HF; experience of a hospice care

Alonso et al. 2017 [45]

Descriptive interview

Qualitative and quantitative

USA

80

Disease severity; disease terminality

Imes et al. 2011 [46]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

USA

14

Experience of FCG with HF; experience of FCG with providers; patient's experience as perceived by partner

Bakitas et al. 2017 [47]

Feasibility study

Quantitative

USA

48

Comparison between ENABLE-CHF-PC intervention in two sites for patient outcomes and FCG outcomes (BCOS, HADS anxiety and depression, physical and mental health, MBCB, stress burden and mental burden, PAC self affirmation, outlook on life)

Buck et al. 2013 [48]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

USA

7

Hospice experience and utility of the book

Neuwirth et al. 2012 [49]

Videoethnography

Qualitative

USA

3

Qualitative description of utility of video in managing pts an CG (very few about FCG)

Hupcey et al. 2011 [50]

Semistructured interview (grounded theory design)

Qualitative

USA

45

Financial, psychosocial, physical issues

Retrum et al. 2013 [51]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

USA

17

congruence and incongruence between dyads members

Metzger et al. 2013 [52]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

USA

16

knowledge of PC; role of PC; PC and hospice

Schwarz et al. 2012 [53]

Retrospective collection of interviews

Qualitative

USA

20

Role of PC consultation

Metzger et al. 2013 [54]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

USA

16

Knowledge of PC; role of PC; conflation between PC and hospice

Dionne-Odom et al. 2014 [55]

Two-phase formative evaluation study

Quantitative and qualitative

USA

11

FCG burden; QoL of FCG. Measures with scales

Mcmillan et al. 2007 [56]

Retrospective chart review

quantitative

USA

37

In hospice psychosocial issues measured with CES-D

Alonso et al. 2018 [57]

Descriptive interview

Qualitative

USA

23

caregiver resources, role management, caregiver-parent relationships, filial responsibility, and personal benefits and challenges

Aldred et al. 2005 [58]

Narrative interview

Qualitative

UK

10

Impact on everyday life; impact on relationships patient-FCG); professional support; concern about the future; lack of time from doctors (FD and cardiologist)

Stocker et al. 2017 [59]

Semistructured interview (grounded theory design)

Qualitative

UK

3

Prognosis/diagnosis; future

Boyd et al. 2004 [60]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

UK

20

Physical problems; psychosocial issues; organization of care; end-of-life

Harding et al. 2008 [61]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

UK

11

Symptoms management; future care; living without infos; barrier to communication

Browne et al. 2014 [62]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

UK

20

knowledge deficit, difficulty in accessing health and social care support, barriers to optimal care

Ross et al. 2015 [63]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

UK

8

Spiritual needs

Leeming et al. 2014 [64]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

UK

12

Social isolation; coping strategies; End-of-life worries; family roles

Simmonds et al. 2015 [65]

Longitudinal, patient-led ethnography

Qualitative

UK

9

How FCG perceive living with HF and key events in illness

Small et al. 2009 [66]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

UK

20

Analysis of period prior to death; hospital staying; the bereavement

Chester et al. 2021 [67]

Focus interview

Qualitative

UK

4

perceptions of referral to palliative care, key components of the new service that were deemed helpful, and unhelpful in terms of care

Alvariza et al. 2017 [71]

Semistructured interview

Qualitative

Sweden

14

Impact on FCG of pts conditions; FCG state of mind and condition

Brannstrom et al. 2007 [72]

Narrative interview

Phenomenological-hermeneutic method. Qualitative

Sweden

4

Responsibility of care (physical, emotional)

Ng et al. 2017 [73]

Randomized controlled trial

quantitative

Hong-Kong

84

FCG burden with ZBI scale

For PT QoL; symptom burden

Kaasalainen et al. 2013 [68]

Descriptive interview

Qualitative

Canada

7

Living with restrictions of HF and comorbidities; decision-making about end-of-life; communication

Schulz et al. 2017 [69]

Semi-structured interviews

Qualitative

Canada

209

Psychosocial aspects of death and dying

Im et al. 2019 [70]

Descriptive interview

Qualitative

Canada

19

understanding of illness, uncertainty and end‐of‐life communication

Fitzsimons et al. 2019 [74]

Descriptive interview

Qualitative

Ireland

30

communication with professionals, knowledge about future