Skip to main content

Table 2 Use of Telemedicine by PLHIV

From: Experiences with telemedicine for HIV care in two federally qualified health centers in Los Angeles: a qualitative study

 

Overall

(N = 31)

N (%)

Clinic 1

(N = 15)

N (%)

Clinic 2

(N = 16)

N (%)

Used telemedicine for HIV care in past year

 Yes

28 (90)

12 (80)

16 (100)

 No

3 (10)

3 (20)

0 (0)

Mode of telemedicine used

 Telephone only

24 (78)

8 (53)

16 (100)

 Video only

2 (6)

2 (13)

0 (0)

 Both telephone and video

2 (6)

2 (13)

0 (0)

 N/A (No use of telemedicine in past year)

3 (10)

3 (20)

0 (0)

Technological resources available

 Phone (no internet)

1 (3)

0 (0)

1 (6)

 Smartphone (with internet)

7 (22)

3 (20)

4 (25)

 Smartphone and computer

23 (75)

12 (80)

11 (69)

Number of in-person visits in prior year for HIV carea

 0

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 1–2

7 (22)

3 (20)

4 (25)

 3–4

11 (36)

4 (27)

7 (44)

 5 or more

13 (42)

8 (53)

5 (31)

Number of telemedicine visits in prior year for HIV carea

 0

3 (10)

3 (20)

0 (0)

 1–2

14 (45)

7 (47)

7 (44)

 3–4

12 (39)

5 (33)

7 (44)

 5 or more

2 (6)

0 (0)

2 (13)

Use of telemedicine for other non-HIV careb

 Yes

11 (36)

10 (67)

1 (6)

 No

20 (64)

5 (33)

15 (94)

  1. aBased on self-report, bTypes of non−HIV care utilized via telemedicine: mental health, case management, SARS−CoV−2 care, specialized care (oncology, nephrology, physical therapy, dentistry)