Country | HTA agency | Type of assessment | Role of HTA | Requirements for public reimbursement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Germany | Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) | Relative clinical benefit assessment | Informs pricing negotiations with the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds | EMA authorisation |
France | Transparency Committee—Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) | Relative clinical benefit assessment | Informs pricing (ASMR) and reimbursement rate (SMR) | EMA authorisation and SMR rating above insufficient |
England | National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) | Clinical and cost-effectiveness | Issues binding reimbursement recommendations. Indirectly influences pricing through cost-effectiveness thresholds | EMA authorisation and NICE approvala |
Scotland | Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) | Clinical and cost-effectiveness | Informs pricing and reimbursement decisions by NHS boards. NHS boards not required to follow recommendation, but must wait for an SMC assessment to be issued | EMA authorisation and SMC assessment |
Canada | Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) and pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) | Clinical and cost-effectiveness | Informs provincial pricing and reimbursement. Provinces are not required to follow recommendation and negotiate either jointly or individually with manufacturers | Health Canada authorisation and CADTH/PCODR assessmentb |
Australia | Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) | Clinical and cost-effectiveness | Informs pricing and reimbursement in Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS). Minister of Health makes final decision following positive PBAC recommendation | TGA authorisation and PBAC approval |