Skip to main content

Table 2 The Box–Cox transformed per-capita OOP dental expenditures and distribution of both groups by covariates

From: The effects of orthodontic treatment on personal dental expenditures in South Korea: a follow-up study using Korean health panel survey

Variables

OT group

(n = 218)

Non-OT group

(n = 654)

P-value*

n (%)

n (%)

 

Per capita OOP dental expenditures(Unit: KRW)

9488 (22868)

13448 (31154)

0.045a

Sex

 Male

50 (22.94)

165 (25.23)

0.496

 Female

168 (77.06)

489 (74.77)

 

Age (years)

 19–29

160 (73.39)

487 (74.46)

0. 496

 ≥ 30

58 (26.61)

167 (25.54)

 

Education level

 ≤ High school

42 (19.27)

131 (20.03)

0.806

 ≥ College

176 (80.73)

523 (79.97)

 

Employment

 No/do not know

127 (58.26)

378 (57.80)

0.905

 Yes

91 (41.74)

276 (42.20)

 

Income level

 Low (Q1)

11 ( 5.05)

38 ( 5.81)

0.904

 Middle (Q2–Q4)

139 (63.76)

417 (63.76)

 

 High (Q5)

68 (31.19)

199 (30.43)

 

Marital status

 No

171 (78.44)

512 (78.29)

0.962

 Yes

47 (21.56)

142 (21.71)

 

Private insurance

 No

50 (22.94)

146 (22.32)

0.851

 Yes

168 (77.06)

508 (77.68)

 
  1. OT Orthodontic treatment, Non-OT Non-orthodontic treatment
  2. Q1 1st quintile, Q2–Q4 2nd–4th quintile, Q5 5th quintile
  3. aPer capita OOP expenditure denotes mean (standard deviation); p-value was obtained using a t-test
  4. *P-values for covariates were obtained using a chi-squared test excepting for mean per capita OOP dental expenditures