Table 4 Correlates of cervical cancer screening documented in family planning registers or other log books in family planning clinics in Mombasa County, Kenya between October 1st 2017 to December 31, 2018
Variable | Any cervical cancer screening (N = 22) | No cervical cancer screening captured (N = 48) | PR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Public (as compared to non-public) | 11 (50%) | 8 (17%) | 2.68 (1.40–5.14) | 0.003 |
Urban (as compared to non-urban) | 11 (50%) | 27 (56%) | 1.19 (0.60–2.37) | 0.6 |
Presence of non-governmental organization support | 11 (50%) | 19 (40%) | 1.33 (0.67–2.65) | 0.4 |
Presence of academic institution support | 0 (0%) | 8 (17%) | --a | – |
More clinicians (dichotomized at median of 4) | 11 (50%) | 16 (33%) | 1.59 (0.80–3.15) | 0.2 |
At least one provider trained to perform cervical cancer screening | 18 (82%) | 23 (48%) | 3.18 (1.20–8.43) | 0.02 |
Management meetings held | 20 (91%) | 41 (85%) | 1.48 (0.41–5.27) | 0.6 |