Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between adjusted and unadjusted results (in OR) from ordered logistic regression (n = 6154 patients)

From: Interprofessional collaboration and patient-reported outcomes: a secondary data analysis based on large scale survey data

 

Overall satisfaction

Less discomforts

Complications

Treatment success

Willingness to recommend

Department-specific IPC

U: 1.03 (0.95–1.11), p = 0.492,

U: 1.05 (0.96–1.15), p = 0.288

U: 1.06 (1.00–1.11), p = 0.046

U: 1.05 (0.99–1.11), p = 0.122

U: 1.02 (0.95–1.10), p = 0.522

A: 1.06 (0.98–1.12), p = 0.136, q = 0.64

A: 1.07 (0.96–1.19), p = 0.208, q = 0.64

A: 1.07 (1.00–1.13), p = 0.029, q = 0.64

A: 1.05 (0.98–1.12), p = 0.206, q = 0.64

A: 1.06 (0.99–1.12), p = 0.110,q = 0.64

Interprofessional organization

U: 1.06 (0.96–1.16), p = 0.235

U: 1.03 (0.94–1.12), p = 0.538

U: 0.94 (0.89–1.00), p = 0.071

U: 1.04 (0.97–1.12), p = 0.272

U: 1.05 (0.97–1.13), p = 0.256

A: 1.03 (0.95–1.13), p = 0.380, q = 0.64

A: 1.03 (0.94–1.13), p = 0.494, q = 0.64

A: 0.95 (0.89–1.01), p = 0.096, q = 0.64

A: 1.03 (0.95–1.12), p = 0.430, q = 0.64

A: 1.04 (0.97–1.12), p = 0.302, q = 0.64

Overall IPC

U: 0.99 (0.90–1.08), p = 0.818

U: 0.92 (0.80–1.06), p = 0.263

U: 1.03 (0.96–1.12), p = 0.399

U: 0.99 (0.92–1.07), p = 0.830

U: 0.96 (0.88–1.04), p = 0.311

A: 0.97 (0.88–1.07), p = 0.526, q = 0.64

A: 0.90 (0.79–1.02), p = 0.108, q = 0.64

A: 1.02 (0.96–1.09), p = 0.568, q = 0.64

A: 1.00 (0.92–1.08), p = 0.954, q = 0.803

A: 0.93 (0.85–1.03), p = 0.167, q = 0.64

  1. U = unadjusted, A = adjusted; results are presented in OR with 95% CI, p = p-value (unadjusted for multiple inference), q = sharpened FDR-q-value based on Benjamini et al. 2006