Table 3 Evaluation of the helpfulness and importance of different professional backgrounds to the workshop
| Â | Helpfulness | Importance | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Medicine (n = 58) | Law (n = 17) | Administration (n = 21) | Others (n = 8) | p value | Medicine (n = 58) | Law (n = 17) | Administration (n = 21) | Others (n = 8) | p value | |
Introduction to medical dispute mediation mechanism | 3.79 ± 0.41 | 3.76 ± 0.44 | 3.62 ± 0.50 | 3.75 ± 0.46 | 0.483 | 3.9 ± 0.31 | 3.82 ± 0.39 | 3.76 ± 0.44 | 3.75 ± 0.46 | 0.415 |
Medical dispute mediation procedure | 3.81 ± 0.40 | 3.88 ± 0.33 | 3.67 ± 0.48 | 3.63 ± 0.52 | 0.265 | 3.88 ± 0.33 | 3.88 ± 0.33 | 3.81 ± 0.4 | 3.88 ± 0.35 | 0.877 |
Role of the dual-mediators | 3.74 ± 0.44 | 3.88 ± 0.33 | 3.62 ± 0.50 | 3.63 ± 0.52 | 0.29 | 3.86 ± 0.35 | 3.88 ± 0.33 | 3.76 ± 0.44 | 3.88 ± 0.35 | 0.696 |
Mediation principles and techniques | 3.72 ± 0.45 | 3.88 ± 0.33 | 3.67 ± 0.48 | 3.63 ± 0.52 | 0.418 | 3.84 ± 0.37 | 3.82 ± 0.39 | 3.76 ± 0.44 | 3.88 ± 0.35 | 0.836 |
Issues of law | 3.69 ± 0.50 | 3.82 ± 0.39 | 3.57 ± 0.51 | 3.75 ± 0.46 | 0.45 | 3.83 ± 0.42 | 3.71 ± 0.47 | 3.76 ± 0.44 | 3.88 ± 0.35 | 0.692 |
Legal analysis | 3.67 ± 0.51 | 3.82 ± 0.39 | 3.62 ± 0.50 | 3.5 ± 0.54 | 0.422 | 3.79 ± 0.45 | 3.76 ± 0.56 | 3.71 ± 0.46 | 3.75 ± 0.46 | 0.93 |
Average | 3.74 ± 0.40 | 3.84 ± 0.34 | 3.63 ± 0.45 | 3.65 ± 0.46 | 0.392 | 3.85 ± 0.32 | 3.81 ± 0.34 | 3.76 ± 0.41 | 3.83 ± 0.36 | 0.794 |