Skip to main content

Table 3 Perceptions of Risk-Benefit in FPDIP

From: Family presence during invasive procedures: a pilot study to test a tool

Item number (original order)/Loads (%)

F1

43.60

F2

8.40

F3. 6.60

1

Family members should be given the option to be present while their loved one is undergoing an IP

 

0.658

 

2

Family members would be terrified to witness the technique of an invasive procedure

 

−0.661

 

4

The health team could develop a close relationship with relatives who witness IP compared to relatives who do not witness them

 

0.480

 

6

Family members should be given the option to be present while their loved one is undergoing an invasive procedure

 

0.673

 

7

Patients do NOT want their family members to be present during IP

   

8

The healthcare team would work harder if family members were present during IP

 

−0.560

 

9

Family members who witness a failed invasive procedure will have a better understanding of what happened

  

0.536

10

If my loved one is having an invasive procedure, I should be allowed to be present as I am a nurse or physician

  

0.539

11

The presence of family members will interfere with the techniques of IP

−0.491

  

15

Family members in the unit where I work prefer to be present during IP

 

0.498

 

16

FPDIP is beneficial for patients

 

0.505

 

17

FPDIP is beneficial for families

 

0.493

 

18

FPDIP is beneficial for nurses

0.623

  

19

FPDIP is beneficial for physicians

0.598

  

20

FPDIP should be part of family centered care

0.568

  

21

FPDIP will have a positive effect on the patient’s hospital care satisfaction survey

0.845

  

22

FPDIP will have a positive effect on the satisfaction survey of the hospital by the family

0.844

  

23

FPDIP will have a positive effect on the nurse’s hospital care satisfaction survey

0.820

  

24

FPDIP will have a positive effect on the physician’s hospital care satisfaction survey

0.812

  

25

The presence of family members during IP is a right that all patients should have

  

0.723

26

The presence of family members during IP is a right that all family members should have.

  

0.714

  1. Extraction method: principal component analysis
  2. Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization a
  3. The rotation has converged in 9 iterations
  4. KMO and Bartlett test Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy 0.862
  5. Bartlett’s sphericity test Approx: Chi square 1753.463; gl 210; Sig 0.000