Skip to main content

Table 7 Unadjusted and Adjusted Logistic Regression Models for Modern Contraceptive Method Received, Overall and by Age Category

From: The association of quality contraceptive counseling measures with postabortion contraceptive method acceptance and choice: results from client exit interviews across eight countries

Independent Variables

Unadjusteda

Adjustedb

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Lower

Upper

Lower

Upper

 

All Clients ( n = 1,972)

All Clients ( n = 1,798)

Contraception Information Exchange Metric

1.2**

1.1

1.4

1.3***

1.2

1.5

Interpersonal Communication Metric

1.0

0.9

1.2

1.1

0.9

1.3

Client felt pressure from the provider to accept a particular contraceptive method

2.0***

1.4

2.8

1.9***

1.3

2.8

 

Clients Under 25 ( n = 879)

Clients Under 25 ( n = 781)

Contraception Information Exchange Metric

1.1

0.9

1.4

1.3*

1.1

1.7

Interpersonal Communication Metric

1.0

0.8

1.3

1.1

0.8

1.4

Client felt pressure from the provider to accept a particular contraceptive method

2.0*

1.2

3.3

1.9*

1.0

3.4

 

Clients 25+ ( n = 1,093)

Clients 25+ ( n = 1,017)

Contraception Information Exchange Metric

1.2**

1.1

1.4

1.3**

1.1

1.6

Interpersonal Communication Metric

1.0

0.8

1.2

1.1

0.9

1.4

Client felt pressure from the provider to accept a particular contraceptive method

2.0**

1.3

3.1

1.9**

1.2

3.0

  1. aUnadjusted models contain all three independent variables: Contraception information exchange metric, interpersonal communication metric and client felt pressure from provider to accept a particular method
  2. bAdjusted models contain all three independent variables and client sociodemographic and abortion service characteristics are controlled. Client sociodemographic characteristics include country, marital status, age, education, and ever use of contraception. Abortion service characteristics included gestation, type of service and abortion procedure type.
  3. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001