Skip to main content

Table 10 Item characteristics, ordering of response categories, and DIF of the 12-item short version HLS19-Q12-NO

From: Developing the HLS19-YP12 for measuring health literacy in young people: a latent trait analysis using Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis

HD

CD

Item no

RW in HLS19

Item:On a scale from very difficult to very easy, how easy would you say it is:

1-dimensional analysis HLS19- Q12-NO

ConQuest

RUMM

Infitw MNSQ

CI

T- value

Item estimate

SE

Ordered

DIFa

lb

ub

HC

F

2

 

…to find information on treatments of illnesses that concern you?

1.10

0.86

1.14

1.3

0.173

0.082

yes

none

U

7

x

…to understand information about what to do in a medical emergency?

1.00

0.86

1.14

0.0

0.187

0.077

yes

none

J

10

 

…to judge the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options?

1.02

0.87

1.13

0.3

0.501

0.082

yes

none

A

14

 

…to follow instructions on medication?

0.98

0.86

1.14

-0.2

-0.668

0.082

yes

LSb

DP

F

18

x

…to find information on how to handle mental health problems?

1.01

0.87

1.13

0.1

0.619

0.073

yes

none

U

23

x

…to understand information about recommended health screenings or examinations?

0.94

0.86

1.14

-0.9

-0.390

0.082

yes

none

J

28

x

…to judge if the information on health risks in the mass media is reliable?

1.13

0.87

1.13

1.9

0.660

0.075

yes

none

A

30

x

…to decide how you can protect yourself from illness using advice from family or friends?

1.03

0.87

1.13

0.5

0.003

0.081

yes

none

HP

F

32

x

…to find information on healthy lifestyles such as physical exercise, healthy food, or nutrition?

1.00

0.87

1.13

0.0

-0.449

0.074

yes

none

U

38

 

…to understand information on food packaging?

0.96

0.87

1.13

-0.6

-0.128

0.075

yes

none

J

43

x

…to judge which everyday habits affect your health?

0.94

0.86

1.14

-0.9

-0.500

0.082

yes

none

A

44

x

…to make decisions to improve your health and well-being?

1.00

0.87

1.13

0.0

-0.008

0.076

yes

none

  1. LS Level in the society, LT Long-term illness, H Health status, HD Health domains, CD Cognitive domains, HC Health care, DP Disease prevention, HP Health promotion, RW Rewording, F Find, U Understand, J Judge, A Apply, lb Lower bound, ub Upper bound, CI Confidence interval, T-value Similar to the z standardized fit statistics in unidimensional Rasch analyses, MNSQ Mean square value, SE Standard Error
  2. w weighted fit MNSQ, unidimensional model using ConQuest 5
  3. u A t-value > 1.96 indicates a poorly fitting item in terms of under-discrimination relative to the Rasch model
  4. DIF: differential item functioning; aBonferroni-adjusted 5% has been used to assist detecting possible significant deviations due to DIF; b uniform DIF; c non-uniform DIF; g Graphical only; Full-CI: Class Interval main effect applied to age, gender, education, economic deprivation, level in society, long-term illness and health status; nb Full-CI significant at 5%-level, but not significant when adjusted for Bonferroni 5%-level; Ordered: "no" refers to an item with disordered response categories
Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us