Skip to main content

Table 2 Statistically significant differences in different types of contacts between health centre areas

From: Association of travel time with mental health service use in primary health care according to contact type — a register-based study in Kainuu, Finland

 

Hyr

Kaj

Kuh

Pal

Puo

Ris

Sot

Suo

Vuo

Contact type

Mean ranks (number of significant differences between areas*)

 ipv

3351 (4)

3985 (5)

3715 (5)

3674 (2)

3384 (4)

3257 (4)

3697 (4)

3900 (5)

3826 (3)

 rc

3901 (0)

3854 (3)

4151 (4)

4040 (2)

3946 (2)

3395 (1)

3495 (4)

3481 (4)

4042 (0)

 hv

4314 (5)

3583 (5)

4325 (5)

3747 (3)

3587 (4)

3552 (4)

3838 (4)

4277 (5)

4193 (3)

  1. Hyr (Hyrynsalmi); Kaj (Kajaani); Kuh (Kuhmo); Pal (Paltamo); Puo (Puolanka); Ris (Ristijärvi); Sot (Sotkamo); Suo (Suomussalmi); Vuo (Vuolijoki)
  2. Kruskal–Wallis test:
  3. ipv = in-person visits: H (df 8, N 7643) = 63,28; p < 0,001
  4. rc = remote contacts: H (df 8, N 7643) = 78,08; p < 0,001
  5. hv = home visits: H (df 8, N 7643) = 306,19; p < 0,001
  6. *Dunn’s pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni corrections: p < 0,05
  7. The population (N = 7643) consists of patients using primary health care mental health services according to the Finnish Care Register for Health Care in the Kainuu region from 2015–2019 (deceased patients are excluded)