Table 2 Using the C-BiLLT in practice, barriers (−) and facilitators (+) experienced by all users, by clinicians using the C-BiLLT with the intended population, and by clinicians using the C-BiLLT in lieu of traditional language tests
Capability | Opportunity | Motivation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factors Experienced by | Physical | Psychological | Physical | Social | Reflective | Automatic |
All C-BiLLT users regardless of population or mode of assessment | +General assessment skills | + Professional skill set (e.g., clinical reasoning, communication) | - Incompatibility of C-BiLLT software with organisation’s IT environment/policies | - Low status | +Evidence-based | +Agency |
- Insufficient practice | + A smooth assessment | |||||
Clinicians using C-BiLLT with intended population | - Lack of skills to accommodate for vision impairments during assessment | - Lack of knowledge re: vision impairments | - Equipment issues: lack of budget, lack of space, and/or lack of equipment | + Makes it possible to “uncover what’s within” | - Technology related frustrations | |
- Lack of skills to use eye tracking equipment | - Difficulty interpreting clients’ behaviour | + Beliefs about positive consequences for clients | ||||
Clinicians using C-BiLLT in lieu of traditional language tests | + Easy to organize the assessment | |||||