Skip to main content

Table 6 Truth table model 3. The table demonstrates the truth table results from model 3 – working relationships and environment based on 15 intervention studies. The truth table shows the associations between configurations of conditions and outcomes

From: Interventions targeting healthcare providers to optimise use of caesarean section: a qualitative comparative analysis to identify important intervention features

Row

Multidisciplinary collaboration

Providers' willingness to change

Internal policies

CS outcome

Number of studies

Inclusion scorea

PRIb

Cases

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

[34]

2

1

1

0

1

2

1

1

[22, 40]

3

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

[39]

4

1

0

0

1

3

1

1

[24, 35, 73]

5

0

1

0

1

2

1

1

[33, 38]

6

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

[42, 46]

7

0

0

1

0

2

0

0

[43, 44]

8

1

0

1

0

2

0

0

[41, 45]

  1. aInclusion score: sometimes referred as consistency indicates the degree to which the evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that there is sufficiency relation between the configuration and the outcome; bPRI: Proportional Reduction in Inconsistency, refers to the extent in which a configuration is sufficient in triggering successful outcome as well as the negation of the outcome