Interventions targeting healthcare providers to optimise use of caesarean section: a qualitative comparative analysis to identify important intervention features

Table 5 Truth table model 2. The table demonstrates the truth table results from model 2 – audit and feedback process based on 15 intervention studies. The truth table shows the associations between configurations of conditions and outcomes

Row	Individual dissemination	Actionable recommendations	Frequency of audit and feedback cycle	Dictated	CS outcome	Number of studies	Inclusion score^a	PRI^b	Cases
1	0	1	0	1	1	1	1	1	[73]
2	0	1	1	0	1	4	1	1	[24, 33, 34, 40]
3	1	1	0	0	1	1	1	1	[39]
4	1	1	1	0	1	3	1	1	[22, 35, 38]
5	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	[45]
6	0	1	1	1	0	2	0	0	[42, 43]
7	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	[44]
8	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	[41]
9	1	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	[46]

^aInclusion score: sometimes referred as consistency indicates the degree to which the evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that there is sufficiency relation between the configuration and the outcome; ^bPRI: Proportional Reduction in Inconsistency, refers to the extent in which a configuration is sufficient in triggering successful outcome as well as the negation of the outcome

ISSN: 1472-6963