Association between competencies of biopsychosocial approach and job satisfaction of rehabilitation professionals in Ukraine

Table 2 Differences in mean scores (ANOVA) for BPS, each BPS dimension and global job satisfaction by cluster

	Total		None or Private Practice		Private Health		OT or PT in PHI		Specialist in PHI
	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	Mean	SD	F	p
BPS	3.86	0.37	3.81	0.37	3.91	0.35	3.83	0.36	3.88	0.40	0.92	.432
BPS_P	3.99	0.46	3.90	0.51	4.01	.040	3.97	0.49	4.04	0.45	1.13	.337
BPS_A	3.88	0.57	3.91	0.40	4.03	0.50	3.86	0.61	3.72	0.66	3.79	.011*
BPS_E	3.96	0.49	3.89	0.51	4.07	0.49	3.92	0.45	3.92	0.51	1.92	.127
BPS_N	3.82	0.45	3.75	0.49	3.79	0.46	3.80	0.39	3.92	0.46	1.79	.148
BPS_U	3.59	0.57	3.56	0.58	3.61	0.52	3.55	0.60	3.64	0.59	0.38	.769
Job Satis	3.83	0.57	3.82	0.56	3.86	0.60	3.81	0.59	3.84	0.52	0.11	.957

BPS_P, Professional knowledge and skills; BPS_A, Assessment and report; BPS_E, Using expertise of the client; BPS_N, Networking; BPS_U; Using the environment; Job Satis, Global Job Satisfaction
*p < .05

ISSN: 1472-6963