Table 2 Summary of Outcome Data

Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)

 CBTp-SC meets my approval

4.31 (.70)

4.30 (.67)

4.60 (.60)

4.43 (.65)

4.24

4.63

 CBTp-SC is appealing to me

4.00 (.89)

4.25 (.79)

4.70 (.73)

4.36 (.85)

4.11

4.61

 I like CBTp-SC

4.06 (.68)

4.30 (.67)

4.58 (.84)

4.33 (.77)

4.10

4.56

 I welcome CBTp-SC

4.13 (.72)

4.50 (.53)

4.75 (.44)

4.48 (.62)

4.29

4.66

 AIM Total Mean Score

4.13 (.68)

4.34 (.62)

4.64 (.62)

4.39 (.67)

4.19

4.59

Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)

 CBTp-SC seems fitting

4.25 (.58)

4.20 (.92)

4.55 (.51)

4.37 (.65)

4.18

4.56

 CBTp-SC seems suitable

4.25 (.58)

4.40 (.52)

4.50 (.51)

4.39 (.54)

4.23

4.55

 CBTp-SC seems applicable

4.25 (.58)

4.20 (.92)

4.55 (.51)

4.37 (.65)

4.18

4.56

 CBTp-SC seems like a good match

4.25 (.58)

4.10 (.88)

4.50 (.69)

4.33 (.70)

4.12

4.53

 IAM Total Mean Score

4.25 (.58)

4.23 (.77)

4.53 (.53)

4.36 (.60)

4.18

4.54

Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)

 CBTp-SC seems implementable

4.19 (.54)

3.90 (.99)

4.35 (.59)

4.20 (.69)

3.99

4.40

 CBTp-SC seems possible

4.25 (.58)

4.40 (.70)

4.55 (.51)

4.41 (.58)

4.24

4.59

 CBTp-SC seems doable

4.13 (.50)

4.20 (.63)

4.50 (.51)

4.30 (.55)

4.14

4.47

 CBTp-SC seems easy to use

3.81 (.83)

3.90 (.99)

3.70 (.92)

3.78 (.89)

3.52

4.05

 FIM Total Mean Score

4.09 (.53)

4.10 (.73)

4.28 (.58)

4.17 (.59)

4.00

4.35

Experience Using the CBTp Model

 How useful is the application of the CBT protocol in which you were trained to your patients experiencing psychotic symptoms?

3.50 (1.03)

3.78 (1.09)

4.20 (.70)

3.87 (.94)

3.58

4.15

 How challenging was applying the CBTp model to your patients?

3.31 (1.08)

2.89 (1.05)

3.13 (.83)

3.14 (.96)

2.86

3.43

 How well do the components of the CBTp protocol you were trained in address the problems/conditions of the patients you delivered the treatment to?

3.31 (.87)

3.11 (.78)

3.85 (.75)

3.51 (.84)

3.26

3.76