Table 5 Results of cost-effectiveness analysis for original, worst-case and best-case scenarios (with 95% CI)
Scenario | QALYs gained | Net costs (£) | ICER per QALY gained (£) | NMB (£) | ROI (£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original | 108 ( 80—143) | 231,188 ( 33,3188—122,814) | 2143 ( 860—4175) | 6,240,594 (4,455,127 – 8,448,442) | 12 ( 9—16) |
Worst case scenario | 64 ( 50—85) | 354,906 ( 412,991—282,420) | 5562 ( 3339—8280) | 3,473,831 ( 2,579,534 – 4,792,587) | 7 ( 5—9) |
Best case scenario | 262 ( 205—336) | -159,335 ( 7,124—-412,217) | -608 ( -1228—35) | 15,866,328 (12,296,102 – 20,546,837) | 31 ( 24—40) |