Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of mixed logit models (main analyses)

From: Do patients’ preferences prevail in hospital selection?: a comparison between discrete choice experiments and revealed hospital choice

 

Breast cancer

cataract

beta

SE a

P value

beta

SE a

P value

ASC b

 

0.810

0.064

< 0.01

0.611

0.052

< 0.01

Attributes

 1) Patient experiences

Below average (ref.)

      

Average

0.816

0.087

< 0.01

1.007

0.062

< 0.01

Above average

1.515

0.091

< 0.01

1.217

0.069

< 0.01

 2) Clinical outcome indicator

  Breast cancer:

Tumor-positive resection margin (in %)

−0.150

0.010

< 0.01

   

  Cataract:

Per-operatively performed vitrectomy (in %)

   

−2.567

0.130

< 0.01

 3) Waiting time

(In working days)

−0.058

0.004

< 0.01

− 0.016

0.002

< 0.01

 4) Travel distance

3 km (ref.)

      

8 km

− 0.351

0.066

< 0.01

− 0.181

0.057

< 0.01

15 km

−0.422

0.064

< 0.01

− 0.674

0.072

< 0.01

 5) Recommendation

Nobody (ref.)

      

Friends and Family

0.659

0.077

< 0.01

−0.029

0.053

0.58

GP

1.259

0.088

< 0.01

0.507

0.062

< 0.01

SD of random parameters

 1) Patient experiences

Average

0.764

0.120

< 0.01

0.227

0.130

0.08

Above average

−0.855

0.114

< 0.01

− 0.857

0.086

< 0.01

 2) Clinical outcome indicator

  Breast cancer:

Tumor-positive resection margin (in %)

0.190

0.012

< 0.01

   

  Cataract:

Per-operatively performed vitrectomy (in %)

   

2.679

0.135

< 0.01

 3) Waiting time (in working days)

 

−0.072

0.004

< 0.01

− 0.033

0.003

< 0.01

 4) Travel distance

8 km

   

−0.410

0.142

< 0.01

15 km

   

−1.143

0.108

< 0.01

 5) Recommendation

Friends and Family

−0.811

0.117

< 0.01

0.280

0.151

0.06

GP

0.530

0.147

< 0.01

−0.783

0.095

< 0.01

Number of individuals

 

631

  

1109

  

Number of observations

 

6304

  

10,980

  

Model fit

Log-likelihood

− 2920.42

  

− 4915.45

  

BIC

5972.07

  

9989.06

  
  1. All random parameters were assumed to be normally distributed and were simulated using 5000 Modified Latin Hypercube Sampling draws
  2. areflects bootstrapped standard errors
  3. bcoded as 1 for the first (left) alternative and 0 for the second alternative. The coefficient reflects the utility derived from any given hospital presented on left hand side of the choice set and thus accounted for any left-to-right bias
  4. ASC Alternative Specific Constant, BIC Bayesian information criterion, GP General Practitioner, KM Kilometer, NA Not Available, Ref. Reference, SD Standard deviation, SE Standard error