Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: A qualitative reflexive thematic analysis into the experiences of being identified with a BRCA1/2 gene alteration: “So many little, little traumas could have been avoided”

Original Submission
17 Jan 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Umair Majid
14 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Nikolett Zsuzsanna Warner
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Nikolett Zsuzsanna Warner
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 May 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 May 2022 Author responded Author comments - Nikolett Zsuzsanna Warner
Resubmission - Version 4
30 May 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Jun 2022 Author responded Author comments - Nikolett Zsuzsanna Warner
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Jun 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Jun 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
20 Jul 2022 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12913-022-08372-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page