Skip to main content

Table 2 Heatwave impacts on health service demand (n = 16)

From: Systematic review of the impact of heatwaves on health service demand in Australia

Location/Data Source

Heatwave Definition

Study type

Effect size (95% CI)

Reference

Hospital Admissions

 Perth, Western Australia

EHF

Retrospective population-based

RR = 1.58 (1.18, 2.11) *

Scalley et al. (2015) [31]

 Adelaide, South Australia

≥35 °C, 3+ days

Case-series analysis

IRR = 1.07 (0.99, 1.16)

Nitschke et al. (2007) [32]

Emergency Department Presentations

 Tasmania

EHF

Case-crossover analysis

OR = 1.05 (1.01, 1.09) *

Campbell et al. (2019) [33]

 Perth. Western Australia

EHF

Population-based time series

OR = 1.05 (1.05, 1.06) *

Patel et al. (2019b) [34]

 Perth, Western Australia

EHF

Retrospective population-based

RR = 1.04 (1.04, 1.05) *

Scalley et al. (2015) [31]

 Western Australia

EHFSevere/extreme

Time series analysis

RR = 1.05 (1.04, 1.06) *

Xiao et al. (2017) [35]

 New South Wales

EHFIntense

Time series analysis

IRR = 1.04 (1.02, 1.05) *

Jegasothy et al. (2017) [36]

 Sydney, New South Wales

BOM identified

Time series analysis

RR = 1.02 (1.01, 1.03) *

Schaffer et al. (2012) [37]

 Brisbane, Queensland

> 37 °C, 2+ days

Case-crossover analysis

OR = 1.15 (1.08, 1.24) *

Wang et al. (2012) [38]

 Brisbane, Queensland

> 37 °C, 2+ days

Time-stratified case-crossover analysis

OR = 1.14 (1.06, 1.23) *

Tong et al. (2012) [39]

 Brisbane, Queensland

≥95th percentile, 2+ days

Time series analysis

RR = 1.10 (1.08, 1.13) *

Tong et al. (2014) [40]

 Brisbane, Queensland

≥95th percentile, 3+ days

Case-crossover analysis

OR = 1.04 (1.02, 1.06) *

Tong et al. (2010) [41]

Ambulance call outs

 Perth, Western Australia

EHF

Population-based time series

RR = 1.02 (1.01, 1.02) *

Patel et al. (2019a) [42]

 Sydney, New South Wales

EHF

Time-series analysis

RR = 1.14 (1.11, 1.16) *

Schaffer et al. (2012) [37]

 New South Wales

EHFIntense

Time series analysis

IRR = 1.05 (1.04, 1.06) *

Jegasothy et al. (2017) [36]

 Adelaide, South Australia

EHFIntense

Case-crossover analysis

RR = 1.21 (0.81, 1.81)

Varghese et al. (2019) [43]

 Adelaide, South Australia

BOM identified

Retrospective population-based

RR = 1.11 (1.08, 1.13) *

Williams et al. (2011) [44]

 Adelaide, South Australia

≥35 °C, 3+ days

Case-series analysis

IRR = 1.04 (1.01, 1.07) *

Nitschke et al. (2007) [32]

Mortality

 Sydney, New South Wales

EHF

Time-series analysis

RR = 1.13 (1.06, 1.22) *

Schaffer et al. (2012) [37]

 New South Wales

EHFIntense

Time series analysis

IRR = 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) *

Jegasothy et al. (2017) [36]

 Adelaide, South Australia

BOM identified

Retrospective population-based

IRR = 1.06 (1.00, 1.11)*

Williams et al. (2011) [44]

Mortality Con’t

 Adelaide, South Australia

≥35 °C, 3+ days

Case-series analysis

IRR = 0.95 (0.90, 1.01)

Nitschke et al. (2007) [32]

 Brisbane, Queensland

> 37 °C, 2+ days

Case-crossover analysis

OR = 1.46 (1.21, 1.77) *

Wang et al. (2012) [38]

 Brisbane, Queensland

> 37 °C, 2+ days

Time-stratified case-crossover analysis

RR = 1.92 (1.40, 2.11) *

Tong et al. (2012) [39]

 Brisbane, Queensland

>95th percentile, 2+ days

Time series analysis

RR = 1.05 (1.03, 1.08) *

Wang et al. (2015) [45]

 Melbourne, Victoria

>95th percentile, 2+ days

Time series analysis

RR = 1.03 (1.01, 1.05) *

Wang et al. (2015) [45]

 Sydney, New South Wales

>95th percentile, 2+ days

Time series analysis

RR = 1.04 (1.02, 1.06) *

Wang et al. (2015) [45]

 Brisbane, Queensland

≥95th percentile, 2+ days

Time series analysis

RR = 1.17 (1.10, 1.25) *

Tong et al. (2014) [40]

 Brisbane, Queensland

≥95th percentile, 3+ days

Case-crossover analysis

OR = 1.10 (1.03, 1.18) *

Tong et al. (2010) [41]

  1. Abbreviations: OR Odds Ratio, RR Relative Risk, IRR Incident Rate Ratio, EHF Excess Heat Factor, BOM Bureau of Meteorology
  2. * denotes statistically significant values at p < 0.05