Skip to main content

Table 2 HCW perspectives on access to SRH barriers and recommendations for improvement, per sector

From: Healthcare workers’ perspectives on access to sexual and reproductive health services in the public, private and private not-for-profit sectors: insights from Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia

 

Overall

N (%)

Public

N (%)

Private

N (%)

OR (95% CI)a

PNFP

N (%)

OR (95% CI)a

Key challenges to accessing SRHC

  Patient lack of knowledge on SRH

354 (37.1)

203 (38.8)

91 (37.0)

0.99 (0.69–1.42)

60 (32.4)

0.75 (0.52–1.09)

  Issues with supply to HF

320 (33.5)

222 (42.5)

56 (22.8)

0.40*** (0.27–0.59)

42 (22.7)

0.44*** (0.29–0.65)

  Frequent stockouts at HF

282 (29.6)

188 (36.0)

49 (19.9)

0.47*** (0.31–0.72)

45 (24.3)

0.57** (0.38–0.85)

  Religious/cultural beliefs

272 (28.5)

142 (27.2)

47 (19.1)

0.75 (0.50–1.15)

83 (44.9)

2.46*** (1.69–3.56)

  Stigma

207 (21.7)

113 (21.6)

56 (22.8)

0.97 (0.63–1.48)

38 (20.5)

0.75 (0.49–1.16)

  Staff shortages

182 (19.1)

144 (27.5)

18 (7.3)

0.26*** (0.15–0.46)

20 (10.8)

0.34*** (0.21–0.57)

  Staff training on SRH services

148 (15.5)

101 (19.3)

24 (9.8)

0.49** (0.28–0.83)

23 (12.4)

0.61 (0.37–1.01)

  Patient costs

145 (15.2)

24 (4.6)

82 (33.3)

6.83*** (3.98–11.70)

39 (21.1)

4.58*** (2.61–8.03)

  No demand

102 (10.7)

40 (7.7)

45 (18.3)

1.30 (0.74–2.28)

17 (9.2)

1.02 (0.55–1.91)

  Frequent stockouts at central level

102 (10.7)

71 (13.6)

23 (9.4)

0.70 (0.39–1.25)

8 (4.3)

0.35** (0.16–0.75)

SRHC stockout causes

  Delay in supply delivery

471 (54.1)

320 (63.9)

83 (37.4)

0.36 (0.24–0.54)***

68 (46.0)

0.52** (0.34–0.77)

  What is ordered is not what HF received

295 (33.9)

226 (45.1)

37 (16.7)

0.31 (0.20–0.49)***

32 (21.6)

0.35*** (0.22–0.54)

  Problems with stock at medical stores

264 (30.3)

170 (33.9)

61 (27.5)

0.94 (0.62–1.41)

33 (22.3)

0.61* (0.39–0.95)

  Demand higher than availability

185 (21.2)

120 (24.0)

37 (16.7)

0.49** (0.31–0.81)

28 (18.9)

0.76 (0.47–1.23)

  Affordability for HF

138 (15.8)

33 (6.6)

67 (30.2)

5.59*** (3.27–9.53)

38 (25.7)

4.82*** (2.79–8.34)

  Poor stock management at HF

128 (14.7)

63 (12.6)

34 (15.3)

1.37 (0.81–2.32)

31 (21.0)

1.84* (1.11–3.04)

  Lack of storage space at HF

80 (9.2)

58 (11.6)

14 (6.3)

0.54 (0.28–1.08)

8 (5.4)

0.48 (0.21–1.07)

  Problems with medicine transport to HF

71 (8.2)

51 (10.2)

10 (4.5)

0.49 (0.22–1.08)

10 (6.8)

0.67 (0.32–1.39)

Recommendations for improvement – supply side

  Improve supply chain

523 (55.6)

346 (66.4)

104 (43.2)

0.40*** (0.27–0.57)

73 (41.0)

0.38*** (0.27–0.56)

  Timely supply of SRHC

430 (45.7)

274 (52.6)

84 (34.9)

0.48*** (0.33–0.70)

72 (40.5)

0.61** (0.42–0.87)

  Prevent stockouts of SRHC at HF

326 (34.7)

192 (36.9)

80 (33.2)

1.04 (0.71–1.50)

54 (30.3)

0.75 (0.51–1.10)

  Ensure sufficient stock available at HF

275 (28.7)

180 (34.2)

56 (22.6)

0.65* (0.44–0.97)

39 (21.2)

0.57** (0.38–0.85)

  Supply SRHC that were ordered

247 (26.3)

179 (34.4)

46 (19.1)

0.56** (0.37–0.86)

22 (12.4)

0.28*** (0.17–0.46)

  (Continued) staff training

216 (23.0)

140 (26.9)

42 (17.4)

0.63* (0.41–0.97)

34 (19.1)

0.66 (0.43–1.03)

  Increase staff

203 (21.6)

143 (27.5)

30 (12.5)

0.51** (0.32–0.82)

30 (16.9)

0.57* (0.36–0.90)

  Increase budget for SRHC

176 (18.7)

112 (21.5)

33 (13.7)

0.50** (0.30–0.81)

31 (17.4)

0.76 (0.48–1.20)

  Provide greater choice of SRHC

147 (15.6)

71 (13.6)

49 (20.3)

1.60* (1.00-2.55)

27 (15.2)

1.05 (0.63–1.73)

Recommendations for improvement – demand side

  Client and community education

778 (81.1)

437 (82.9)

194 (78.2)

0.77 (0.50–1.20)

147 (79.9)

0.89 (0.57–1.39)

  Increase male partner involvement

357 (37.2)

222 (42.1)

82 (33.1)

0.82 (0.57–1.18)

53 (28.8)

0.57** (0.39–0.83)

  Offer/improve SRH outreach services

280 (29.2)

164 (31.1)

62 (25.0)

0.77 (0.52–1.14)

54 (29.4)

0.86 (0.58–1.26)

  Increase choice of contraceptives

222 (23.2)

129 (24.5)

59 (23.8)

0.76 (0.50–1.16)

34 (18.5)

0.76 (0.49–1.18)

  Professionalise HCW-patient relationship

173 (18.0)

102 (19.4)

49 (19.8)

0.88 (0.56–1.36)

22 (12.0)

0.43** (0.26–0.73)

  Reduce costs for clients

202 (21.0)

38 (7.2)

113 (45.2)

7.60*** (4.79–12.04)

51 (27.7)

4.10*** (2.53–6.63)

HF at times unable to provide client with SRHC and services

  Yes

359 (37.0)

155 (29.2)

123 (49.0)

1.57* (1.09–2.26)

81 (42.9)

1.47* (1.02–2.12)

Reasons why unable to provide client with SRHC and services

  SRHC was stocked out

131 (37.3)

84 (56.4)

35 (28.2)

0.30*** (0.16–0.56)

12 (15.4)

0.11*** (0.07–0.28)

  HF does not offer FP services

65 (18.6)

13 (8.8)

24 (19.5)

1.88 (0.82–4.30)

28 (35.9)

6.38*** (2.97–13.72)

  Client unable to pay for service

60 (17.2)

4 (2.7)

44 (35.8)

15.13*** (4.85–47.18)

12 (15.4)

6.88** (2.08–22.70)

  Client was too young

58 (16.6)

19 (12.8)

26 (21.1)

1.72 (0.78–3.83)

13 (16.7)

1.15 (0.51–2.60)

  Service not culturally or religiously acceptable

56 (16.1)

13 (8.7)

5 (4.1)

0.42 (0.13–1.37)

38 (49.4)

12.65*** (5.75–27.81)

  Service would not benefit client

25 (7.2)

11 (7.4)

9 (7.3)

1.26 (0.42–3.81)

5 (6.4)

0.60 (0.19–1.90)

  Lack of HCW knowledge

23 (6.6)

16 (10.7)

5 (4.0)

0.53 (0.16–1.74)

2 (2.6)

0.22* (0.05–0.99)

  Client was unmarried

17 (4.9)

6 (4.1)

4 (3.3)

0.59 (0.13–2.64)

7 (9.0)

1.63 (0.49–5.45)

  1. CI confidence interval, FP family planning, HCW healthcare worker, HF health facility, OR odds ratio, SRH  sexual and reproductive health, SRHC sexual and reproductive health commodities
  2. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
  3. aThe model was corrected for country, location, and level of care of the health facility