Skip to main content

Table 5 Main effect by two-way ANOVA between labor ward

From: Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of patient safety culture and teamwork in intrapartum care: a cross-sectional study

 

Labor ward 1 n = 54

Labor ward 2 n = 72

Labor ward 3 n = 52

F

P value

Tukey’s HSD

Effect size5

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

S-Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture

Unit level dimensions

  Communication openness1

3.6 (.60)

3.7 (.65)

3.9 (.61)

F(2,164) = 2.39

.095

  

  Feedback and communication about error1

3.5 (.67)

4.0 (.70)

3.9 (.67)

F(2,164) = 9.07

.000

2 > 1 (p = .001)

3 > 1 (p = .008)

.10

  Nonpunitive response to error2

3.6 (.74)

3.9 (.76)

3.7 (.80)

F(2,164) = 4.01

.020

2 > 1 (p = .014)

.05

  Organizational learning – continuous improvement2

3.4 (.55)

3.7 (.64)

3.8 (.60)

F(2,164) = 8.97

.000

2 > 1 (p = .001)

3 > 1 (p = .001)

.10

  Staffing2

3.1 (.78)

3.3 (1.05)

3.3 (.81)

F(2,165) = 1.13

.326

  

  Supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting patient safety2

3.7 (.68)

3.6 (.93)

4.0 (.67)

F(2,164) = 2.28

.106

  

  Teamwork within units2

4.2 (.48)

4.3 (.63)

4.3 (.42)

F(2,165) = 3.57

.031

Not significant

 

  Information and support to patients and family who have suffered an adverse event2

3.9 (.64)

4.0 (.63)

3.9 (.63)

F(2,165) = 4.45

.013

Not significant

 

  Information and support to staff who have been involved in an adverse event2

3.5 (.93)

3.7 (.87)

3.8 (.87)

F(2,164) = 2.18

.116

  

 Hospital level dimensions

  Handoffs and transitions2

3.4 (.71)

3.9 (.58)

3.6 (.73)

F(2,166) = 4.62

.0114

  

  Management support for patient safety2

3.2 (.72)

2.8 (.87)

2.9 (.87)

F(2,165) = 2.71

.069

  

  Teamwork across units2

3.5 (.58)

3.3 (.75)

3.7 (.66)

F(2,166) = 5.22

.0064

3 > 2 (p = .002)

.06

Outcome dimensions

  Frequency of events reported1

3.1 (.74)

3.3 (.88)

3.3 (.82)

F(2,163) = 1.71

.185

  

  Overall perceptions of patient safety2

3.7 (.71)

3.8 (.79)

3.8 (.58)

F(2,165) = .59

.555

  

TeamSTEPPS® Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire

n = 57

n = 71

n = 55

    

 Team Structure3

3.8 (.69)

4.1 (.75)

3.9 (.59)

F(2,168) = 3.07

.049

2 > 1 (p = .011)

.04

 Leadership3

3.4 (.76)

3.5 (1.03)

4.1 (.74)

F(2,168) = 8.67

.0004

3 > 1 (p = .000)

3 > 2 (p = .001)

.09

 Situation monitoring3

3.9 (.59)

4.1 (.66)

3.7 (.54)

F(2,167) = 4.87

.009

2 > 3 (p = .003)

.06

 Mutual support3

3.7 (.64)

3.9 (.76)

3.8 (.53)

F(2,167) = 2.68

.072

  

 Communication3

3.8 (.65)

4.1 (.59)

3.8 (.56)

F(2,168) = 4.68

.011

2 > 1 (p = .006)

2 > 3 (p = .007)

.05

  1. 1Scale ranged from 1 = ‘Never’ to 5 = ‘Always’
  2. 2Scale ranged from 1 = ‘Strongly disagree’ to 5 = ‘Strongly agree’
  3. 3Scale ranged from 1 = ‘Strongly disagree with the statement’ to 5 = ‘Strongly agree with the statement’
  4. 4Levene’s test was significant: p < .01
  5. 5Effect size with partial eta squared