Table 1 The isPO QPRs Evaluation Criteria Catalogue
Evaluation structure | Evaluation criteria | Explanations and in-depth evaluation criteria |
|---|---|---|
General Information | Author | Â |
Structure | Â | |
Orientation on deadlines | Â | |
Orientation on the template | Â | |
Annexes | Â | |
Theme-specific evaluation | Role in the project | Description of the task area Comparison with the project proposal Role in the project becomes apparent (consortium partner knows own role and can differentiate it from other roles) Application orientation / "view for practice" (definition and description of target groups; if known, it is described) |
Classification of the subtasks within the area of tasks Is the subtask visible as part of the task area (embedded vs. subtasks) | ||
Scientific / specialist background | Presentation and justification of the basic principles (if applicable: guidelines, standards, laws, theories, experience, etc.) Context of the tasks comprehensible Comparison with project proposal | |
Goals | Project reference, embedding in the task area (if necessary, use table) Milestone vs. additional goals | |
Definition of the goals: specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, terminated (‘SMART’ principle) | ||
Ways to achieve aims / measures | Explanation of content and transparent justification, comprehensible achievement of goals (can this measure achieve this goal?) | |
Representations are intersubjectively comprehensible | ||
Type of measure (sub-measure) | ||
Results | Transparent presentation of the results (partial results) | |
Were the (quarterly) goals achieved? How many goals are there with no result? Are there goals without a result? | ||
Existence of deviations Description of deviations Evaluation and handling of deviations for the achievement of individual goals and milestones Measures and solutions for the deviations | ||
Planned changes Description of the changes Evaluation and handling for the achievement of goals and milestones Measures and approaches regarding the changes | ||
Further procedure / future orientation | Description of the planned milestones and goals (and planned measures, if any) | |
Comparison with project proposal Comprehensible justification for additional goals | ||
Focusing and prioritising of topics (qualitative) | Which topics are in focus (occur how often in the sense of unconscious prioritization) | |
Cooperation with the consortium partners (dependencies etc.) | Scheduling / project meetings | |
Implicit, conscious or unconscious communication content | Institutional traces (author / non-writer) / institutional exhibition (Goffman, 1972), Personal and institutional intentions in the presentation—documentary method | |
If applicable, which topics are not mentioned (or not addressed actively) | ||
Contradictions | Text vs. traffic light (milestones vs. task description) | |
Orientation towards guideline S3 Psycho-oncology (overarching embedding) | Â | |
Document comparison ("conversation between documents"; intra and inter) | Contradictions | Â |
Cooperation (mutual naming of the consortium partners) | Â | |
Timeline: Course of a consortium partner (internal) | Comparison of the subtasks Do the tasks build on each other? Are the tasks embedded? | |
Conclusion | Concise assessment as a consequence of previous analyses | Â |