Skip to main content

Table 1 Monitoring and evaluation (M & E) documents collected and analyzed

From: Implementation strategies for integrating pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention and family planning services for adolescent girls and young women in Kenya: a qualitative study

M & E activity

Documentation (main author)

No. (%) documents (N = 214)

Frequency & type

Participants

Aim

Biweekly meeting

Site study coordinator, study staff involved in direct service provision

To review biweekly enrollment numbers and service delivery-related activities undertaken since last meeting (e.g., PrEP information sessions held for non-POWER staff to raise awareness about PrEP/its availability at the site).

Meeting notes (project coordinator and site study coordinator)

76 (36)

Monthly call

Full POWER research teama

To discuss the research study’s progress (e.g., enrollment numbers) and preliminary findings; to obtain consensus about analytic questions (e.g., different ways to calculate PrEP continuation and the pros/cons of each); to discuss changes in Kenya’s/South Africa’s PrEP delivery landscape (e.g., to national PrEP guidelines); and to conduct and provide feedback on dry-runs of study presentations.

Call notes (various authors)a

53 (25)

Monthly call

Project coordinator, site study coordinator, study staff involved in direct service provision

To discuss study operations (e.g., stock levels for study commodities; shipping permits for sending dried blood spot samples to the lab for analysis; ensuring study is in compliance with regulatory agencies).

Call notes (project coordinator)

33 (15)

Monthly call

Site study coordinators, project coordinator, research assistants from Kenya & South Africa sites

To share experiences, challenges, and lessons learned about implementing integrated delivery of PrEP-FP services.

Call notes (site study coordinators)

27 (13)

Quarterly meeting

Study site coordinators, study staff involved in direct service provision

To discuss quarterly enrollment data and high-level challenges to implementation (e.g., nursing strikes) and agree upon next steps.

Meeting notes (site study coordinators)

16 (7)

Annual meeting

Full POWER research teama, other key stakeholdersb

To present study findings to date.

Slide decks (various authors)a

9 (4)

  1. aIncludes PIs, project manager, project coordinator, site study coordinators, study staff involved in direct service provision, research assistants, and other co-investigators
  2. be.g., representatives from the Ministry of Health and local Community Advisory Boards