Table 1 An example of the analysis process from deductive to inductive content analyses
Step 1 Deductive content analysis | Step 2 Inductive content analysis | Step 3 Inductive content analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|
Proctor et al.’s eight implementation outcomes [26] | Data reviewed for content and coded for correspondence with or exemplification of the implementation outcomes | Create sub-categories | Conceptualizing and abstracting into categories |
I. Acceptability Definition: The perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice or innovation is agreeable, palatable or satisfactory | It is easier to perform visual assessments now, as we learned something concrete to use for the assessment. This makes it easier to have an opinion about visual function. (G3) It was very useful to listen to and engage with the stroke survivors, who shared and explained how their vision loss affected their everyday life. I think this was great. (G2) | Access to the KROSS tool was considered important to perform vison assessment Real stories from stroke survivors promotes motivation | A motivating and useful KROSS workshop |