Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural China

Original Submission
18 Feb 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Jun 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Jul 2021 Author responded Author comments - Hong-Wei Pan
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jul 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Aug 2021 Author responded Author comments - Hong-Wei Pan
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Aug 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Aug 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Sep 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
30 Sep 2021 Author responded Author comments - Hong-Wei Pan
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Sep 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Oct 2021 Author responded Author comments - Hong-Wei Pan
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Oct 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
6 Oct 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Oct 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
16 Nov 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Dec 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hong-Wei Pan
Resubmission - Version 7
4 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
6 Jan 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hong-Wei Pan
Resubmission - Version 8
6 Jan 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 8
17 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
17 Jan 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
7 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Hong-Wei Pan
Resubmission - Version 9
7 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
16 Feb 2022 Editorially accepted
25 Feb 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12913-022-07655-6

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page