Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline data of participating practices

From: Experiences with tailoring of primary diabetes care in well-organised general practices: a mixed-methods study

 

A

B

C

D

Total

Volume of registered patients

2 * norm1

1.5* norm

2* norm

>  2 * norm

 

Socioeconomic status

Deprived

Mixed (deprived/advantageous)

Advantageous

Deprived

 

Primary intervention

SMS service

Exploration of patient needs

Patient ePortal

Consultation reduction

 

Participants (n)

49

31

11

35

126

Age (years): median [IQR]

68 [61–72]

68 [64–76]

70 [59–80]

64 [62–70]

68 [62–72]

Diabetes duration (years): median [IQR]

7 [3–9]

6 [2–8]

3 [2–8]

7 [3–10]

6 [3–9]

Gender: female n (%)

21 (43%)

17 (55%)

3 (27%)

14 (40%)

55 (44%)

Monitoring as recommended, n (%)

48 (98%)

25 (81%)

11 (100%)

31 (89%)

115 (91%)

DTSQ Status2: mean (SD)

30.8 (6.5)

32.3 (3.9)

31.3 (6.0)

29.6 (5.4)

30.9 (5.6)

WHO-5: mean (SD)

54.7 (25.0)

68.2 (15.5)

66.5 (26.4)

53.9 (22.9)

58.4 (23.3)

EQ-VAS: mean (SD)

65.3 (22.2)

77.8 (16.6)

82.8 (11.1)

65.8 (16.5)

69.5 (17.7)

  1. Abbreviations
  2. DTSQ: Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Scale
  3. WHO-5 = World Health Organization Wellbeing Index-5
  4. EQ-VAS: EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale
  5. SES: socioeconomic status
  6. 1National norm for average practice volume: 2095 patients.
  7. 2DTSQ: Status = all items except no 2 and 3