Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the study population

From: Access-to-care: evidence from home-based postnatal coordinated care after hospital discharge

 

Women opting to participate in the PRADO program

All of the women eligible for the PRADO program

(n = 2859)

(n = 4189)

Household characteristics

 Woman’s age at pregnancy (years), n (%)

  18–23

176 (6.16)

312 (7.45)

  24–29

978 (34.21)

1413 (33.73)

  30–35

1196 (41.83)

1711 (40.85)

  36–41

473 (16.54)

685 (16.35)

   ≥ 42

36 (1.26)

68 (1.62)

 Number of children, n (%)

  1

1720 (60.16)

2348 (56.05)

  2

713 (24.94)

1056 (25.21)

  3

286 (10.00)

518 (12.37)

   ≥ 4

140 (4.90)

267 (6.37)

 Woman’s healthcare coverage, n (%)

  Policyholder

2625 (91.82)

3751 (89.54)

  Beneficiary

234 (8.18)

438 (10.46)

Prenatal care

 Antenatal visits, n (%)

  0–5

769 (26.90)

1205 (28.77)

  6–7

666 (23.29)

974 (23.25)

   ≥ 8

1424 (49.81)

2010 (47.98)

 Follow-up by a gynecologista, n (%)

  No

765 (26.76)

1156 (27.60)

  Yes

2094 (73.2)

3033 (72.40)

 Follow-up by a general practitionera, n (%)

  No

835 (29.21)

1256 (29.98)

  Yes

2024 (70.79)

2933 (70.02)

 Follow-up by a midwifea, n (%)

  No

1257 (43.97)

1907 (45.52)

  Yes

1602 (56.03)

2282 (54.48)

 Hospital follow-upa, n (%)

  No

898 (31.41)

1309 (31.25)

  Yes

1961 (68.59)

2880 (68.75)

 Community follow-upa, n (%)

  No

388 (13.57)

605 (14.44)

  Yes

2471 (86.43)

3584 (85.56)

 Obstetric ultrasound, n (%)

  0–1

761 (26.62)

1213 (28.96)

  2–3

1346 (47.08)

1913 (45.67)

   ≥ 4

752 (26.30)

1063 (25.38)

 Prenatal education, n (%)

  No

1583 (55.37)

2631 (62.81)

  Yes

1276 (44.63)

1558 (37.19)

 Prenatal information regarding postpartum, n (%)

  No

2416 (84.51)

3709 (88.54)

  Yes

443 (15.49)

480 (11.46)

Postnatal care

 Hospital readmission, n (%)

  No

2811 (98.32)

4123 (98.42)

  Yes

48 (1.68)

66 (1.58)

Municipality characteristics

 Location, n (%)

  Urban

2647 (92.58)

3890 (92.86)

  Rural

212 (7.42)

299 (7.14)

 Household deprivationb, n (%)

  Least deprived

70 (2.45)

96 (2.29)

  Less deprived

745 (26.06)

971 (23.18)

  More deprived

1371 (47.95)

1966 (46.93)

  Most deprived

673 (23.54)

1156 (27.60)

 Accessibility to a gynecologistc, n (%)

  Lowest

560 (19.59)

819 (19.55)

  Low

1771 (61.94)

2661 (63.52)

  High

439 (15.36)

602 (14.37)

  Highest

89 (3.11)

107 (2.55)

 Accessibility to a general practitionerc, n (%)

  Lowest

73 (2.55)

104 (2.48)

  Low

1091 (38.16)

1526 (36.43)

  High

1166 (40.78)

1677 (40.03)

  Highest

529 (18.50)

882 (21.06)

 Accessibility to a midwifec, n (%)

  Lowest

78 (2.73)

118 (2.82)

  Low

1518 (53.10)

2275 (54.31)

  High

1101 (38.51)

1588 (37.91)

  Highest

162 (5.67)

208 (4.97)

Hospital characteristics

 Funding, n (%)

  Public

2398 (83.88)

3531 (84.29)

  Private

461 (16.12)

658 (15.71)

 University status, n (%)

  Non-teaching

1423 (49.77)

2303 (54.98)

  Teaching

1436 (50.23)

1886 (45.02)

 Level of care, n (%)

  No neonatology unit

376 (13.15)

611 (14.59)

  Neonatology unit

816 (28.54)

1173 (28.00)

  Neonatal intensive care unit

1667 (58.31)

2405 (57.41)

Obstetriciansd, mean ± SD

0.47 ± 0.12

0.48 ± 0.12

Midwivesd, mean ± SD

1.73 ± 0.31

1.71 ± 0.30

 Day of delivery, n (%)

  Working

2776 (97.10)

4082 (97.45)

  Non-working

83 (2.90)

107 (2.55)

 Day of discharge, n (%)

  Working

2790 (97.59)

4074 (97.25)

  Non-working

69 (2.41)

115 (2.75)

  1. a At least one antenatal visit
  2. b Based on the median annual income
  3. c Based on the index of spatial accessibility (ISA)
  4. d FTEs (full-time equivalents) per 100 deliveries