Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Health Services Research

Fig. 1

From: Dropping risk stratification with subsequent treatment-risk paradox in non ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a clinical audit in Iraq

Fig. 1

Timing to Intervention in Patients with NSTE-ACS According to GRACE and TIMI Risk Classes§. §Comparing conservative strategy versus invasive strategy according to GRACE risk class p < 0.0001. Comparing timing to catheterization according to GRACE risk class p = 0.037. Comparing conservative strategy versus invasive strategy according to TIMI risk class p = 0.873. Comparing timing to catheterization according to TIMI risk class p = 0.001

Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us