Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of EMR data for PHC performance measurement by initiative

From: The current and potential uses of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data for primary health care performance measurement in the Canadian context: a qualitative analysis

Considerations

CPCSSN

HDC Discover

Manitoba PCQI

Insights4Care

D2D

BIRT

Context

  Jurisdiction

Multiple

British Columbia

Manitoba

Ontario

Ontario

Ontario

  Actor

CPCSSN

Health Data Coalition

Manitoba Health

OntarioMD

AFHTO

The Alliance

  Funder

Public Health Agency of Canada

General Practice Services Committee

Manitoba Health

Ontario Ministry of Health

Ontario Ministry of Health

Multiple sources; not-for-profit

  Duration of initiative

> 5 years

< 5 years

> 5 years

< 5 years

5 years (ended 2019)

> 5 years

Purposes of use

  Target context

Cross-cutting

Micro

Micro

Micro

Micro/Meso

Micro/Meso

  Primary use

Practice-based research

Individual performance improvement; community improvement

Team performance improvement

Individual performance improvement

Planning and improvement of FHT/team

Planning and improvement of CHC/team

  Target users (practice type)

Individual physicians; practice-based researchers

Individual physicians/ NPs (solo/group practices)

Home clinic teams (group practices)

Individual physicians, NPs and practice staff (solo/group practices)

Individual physicians, teams, executives (FHTs)

Individual physician/NPs, executives (CHCs)

Managerial considerations

  Number of indicators

NAa

184

44

64

17

40+

  EMR vendors

Spans across multiple vendors

OSCAR, MOIS, Telus Health, Intrahealth

Spans across multiple vendors

Telus Health, OSCAR

Across yet mainly: Telus Health, Accuro, OSCAR

Telus Health, NOD, Purkinje

  Analysis frequency

6-month

Quarterly

Quarterly

Daily

6-month

Daily

  Feedback format

Portal dashboard

Portal dashboard

Report

EMR-based dashboard

Portal dashboard

Dashboard and report

  Public reporting

No

No

No

No

Yes (summaries)

Yes (annual report)

  User support

Local-network led

Collaboration with practice support program

At-distance supportof department at Manitoba Health

Practice Enhancement Consultants

Network of QIDSS

CHC-based data coordinators; region-al decision support

  Evaluations of initiative

Multiple studies; user feedback

User feedback

Ad hoc

Proof of concept evaluation

Project evaluation

Ad hoc

  1. a As a surveillance database, varied data elements are collected and can be reported on by CPCSSN