Evaluation of interprofessional teamwork modules implementation in an emergency department – A mixed-methods case study of implementation fidelity

Table 2 Qualitative content analysis of 18 individual interviews

Teamwork area	Positive experiences	Negative experiences
	Work together	Time consuming
	Communicate easier	Noisier workplace
	Distribute queue	Queue awareness
	Right from start	Demanding for seniors
Staff fidelity	Important briefing	Passive flow team doctors
	Share team area	Slow care teams
		Flow team nurse overload
		Pointless debriefings
Theme	Enjoying working together,	but feeling less efficient.
Implementation area	Enablers	Barriers
	Top manager support	Physician involvement
	Enjoy improvement groups	Around the clock
	External facilitator	Coaching
	Statistics supply	Five departments
		Novice nurses
Context fidelity		Competency mix not met
		Technical support withdrawn
		Team training discontinued
		Budget adaptations
		Increasing in-bed occupancy
Theme	Stimulating to create,	but challenging to sustain.

The content was classified in two areas, teamwork and implementation. Main categories of the teamwork area were positive and negative experiences of the new work process, including those relating to the staff fidelity. Main categories of the implementation process were enablers and barriers experienced, including those relating to the context fidelity. Each main category consisted of several subcategories. One theme emerged from each content area

ISSN: 1472-6963