Skip to main content

Table 3 Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the intervention and the sensitivity analysis

From: Cost-effectiveness and feasibility of conditional economic incentives and motivational interviewing to improve HIV health outcomes of adolescents living with HIV in Anambra State, Nigeria

  

Cost of HIV care in the intervention arm (USD)

Cost of HIV care in the control arm (USD)

Cost difference (USD)

Effectiveness (%)

ICER ($US/ additional patient with undetectable viral load)

 

Main model

338.70

172.68

166.02

0.117

1419

Sensitivity analysis

Dolutegravir-based combination

338.70

172.68

166.02

0.089

1865

Changes in the cost of ART (±25% [L, U])

317.00 & 360.4

145.35 & 200.00

171.65 & 160.40

0.117

1467 & 1371

Changes in the cost of non-ART (±25% [L, U])

325.52 & 351.88

170.54 & 174.82

154.98 & 177.06

0.117

1325 & 1513

Changes in the CD4 and viral load tests costs (±25% [L, U])

299.78 & 377.63

162.95 & 182.41

136.83 & 195.22

0.117

1169 & 1669

Triannual CD4 and viral load tests for the intervention arm

299.80

172.68

127.12

0.117

1086

Changes in viral load tests cost (±25% [L, U])

305.37 & 372.03

164.36 & 181.01

141.01 & 191.02

0.117

1205 & 1632

Changes in the cost of ART, CD4, and viral load tests (±25% [L, U])

278.08 & 399.32

135.62 & 209.74

142.46 & 189.58

0.117

1218 & 1620

  1. [L, U] lower and upper limit, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ART antiretroviral therapy