Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of clinical outcome measures based on most likely class outcome

From: Sociodemographic aspects and health care-related outcomes: a latent class analysis of informal dementia care dyads

Outcome measures

Classes

p-value

(Wald-Test)

1

2

3

4

5

6

Class size (in %)

22.9

17.1

8.8

14.0

31.4

5.8

 

Quality of life persons living with dementia (QoL-AD, 3–52)a

28.8

26.2

27.2

30.1

29.6

29.7

<  0.001

Social inclusion of persons living with dementia (SACA, 1–32)

24.1

24.2

25.4

23.2

24.9

24.7

0.23

Subjective caregiver burden due to … (BIZA-D PV)

 cognitive losses (0–16)

7.7b (0.46)

9.6 (0.55)

3.7 (0.74)

7.5 (0.36)

8.7 (0.35)

9.4 (0.81)

<  0.001

 aggression and resistance (0–20)

5.3 (0.44)

7.3 (0.70)

2.7 (0.59)

5.5 (0.63)

6.8 (0.42

7.2 (1.04)

<  0.001

 personal constraints/health (0–20)

6.7 (0.58)

10.5 (0.70)

6.6 (1.14)

8.9 (0.42)

7.2 (0.63)

10.7 (1.07)

<  0.001

 lack of social recognition (0–24)

7.1 (0.48)

9.4 (0.61)

8.6 (1.06)

6.0 (0.68)

7.0 (0.42)

11.1 (1.02)

<  0.001

Health status informal caregiver (EQ VAS, 0–100)

75.2

65.1

74.9

61.7

61.0

62.4

<  0.001

Stability of care arrangement (0–3)

2.0

2.1

2.4

2.2

2.3

2.0

0.016

  1. a The ranges of the scales used are listed in brackets following the names of the corresponding instruments. The maximum scores are underlined. Interpretation: Qol-AD: The higher the value, the better the quality of life; SACA: The higher the value, the better the social inclusion; BIZA-D subscales: The higher the values, the higher the burden; EQ VAS: The higher the value, the better the health status; Stability of care arrangement: The higher the value, the more stable the care arrangement
  2. b Class values presented here are mean values. In parentheses: Standard deviation (SD)