Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of Outcome Measures for Evaluation of STAR Program Implementation

From: Protocol for a two-arm pragmatic stepped-wedge hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial evaluating Engagement and Collaborative Management to Proactively Advance Sepsis Survivorship (ENCOMPASS)

    Implementation time point
Assessment Evaluation tool Pre 8 m 20 m 32 m Post
CFIR Construct Assessed
 Outer setting (Patient Needs and resources, Cosmopolitanism, external policies/incentives) Administrative leaders CFIR interviews X     X
Providers CFIR interviews X     X
 Inner Setting (networks/communication, implementation climate, readiness) Administrative leaders CFIR interviews X     X
Providers CFIR interviews X X X X X
Navigators CFIR interviews   X X X  
 Intervention (evidence strength/quality, relative advantage, adaptability, trialability, complexity) Administration CFIR Interviews   X X X  
Providers CFIR Interviews   X X X  
Navigators CFIR Interviews   X X X  
 Individuals (knowledge and beliefs about intervention, self-efficacy) Providers Knowledge survey
Self-Efficacy survey
  X X X  
Navigators Knowledge survey
Self-Efficacy survey
  X X X  
Patients and
Caregivers
Knowledge survey
Self-Efficacy survey
  X X X  
Process (execution) Navigators Focused ethnography   X X X  
Other outcomes assessed
 Reach, Adoption, and Maintenance Patients (Reach) 1) Navigator use per eligible patients
2) risk prediction for those enrolled
  X X X X
Providers (Adoption) # of providers with pts. enrolled   X X X X
 Effectiveness Healthcare utilization 90-day mortality or readmission X     X
 Cost Health system Clinical trial data      X
Societal Extrapolated      X
  1. CFIR Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research