Skip to main content

Table 3 Relevance ratings of institutions (n = 22) by framework sub-dimensions ((mean/min/max) median per indicator)

From: Healthcare planning across healthcare sectors in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany: a stakeholder online survey to identify indicators

Sub-dimension

All indicators (n = 374)

Mean selectedb (n = 212)

Mean not selectedb (n = 162)

Difference selected - not selected

Mean

SD

Min

Max

Non-medical determinants of health

 health behaviours

7.9

0.7

7.0

9.0

7.9

-a

 social determinants

5.8

1.6

2.0

8.0

7.3

4.8

2.5

 demographic factors

6.7

1.0

5.0

8.0

7.6

5.8

1.9

Health status

 morbidity

7.3

0.7

6.0

8.0

7.4

6.0

1.4

 mortality

6.8

0.7

6.0

8.0

7.2

6.0

1.2

Utilisation of the health system

 prevention & health promotion

7.3

0.8

6.0

8.0

7.7

6.0

1.7

 outpatient care

7.0

0.7

6.0

8.0

7.3

6.0

1.3

 semi or full inpatient care

6.5

0.8

6.5

8.5

7.1

5.8

1.3

Health system performance

 accessibility

6.2

1.1

6.5

8.0

7.1

5.2

1.9

 patient centeredness

6.1

1.2

3.5

7.5

7.0

5.0

2.0

 continuity

7.4

0.6

6.0

8.0

7.5

6.0

1.5

 effectiveness & efficiency

6.1

1.4

3.0

8.0

7.3

5.0

2.3

 safety

6.0

1.0

5.0

8.0

8.0

5.6

2.4

Healthcare provision

 facilities

6.8

0.7

5.0

8.0

7.1

5.8

1.3

 professionals

6.5

0.8

4.5

8.0

7.1

5.7

1.4

 technology

5.7

0.9

4.0

7.0

6.8

5.3

1.5

 honorary office

6.0

0.2

5.5

6.0

-a

5.8

  1. The figures presented in this table are based on the median value per indicator resulting from the relevance assessment of participating institutions. E.g. for the sub-dimension health behaviours the mean value over the median value for the 4 indicators of this subdimension is 7.9
  2. Likert-type scale for relevance ratings (1 = not relevant at all to 9 = highly relevant)
  3. SD standard deviation; a Either all or none of the indicators were selected; b Formal consent about the selection i.e. relevance of an indicator was defined by a median in [6.5–9]