Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of findings with published literature

From: Translation of oncology multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM) recommendations into clinical practice

Author & Country

Study type

Study period

n

Number of MDM decisions

Concordance Rate %- Patients

Concordance Rate % - Decisions

Neuro-oncology

 Hollunder et al., Germany [20]

Retrospective

2014–2016

1406

2176

 

64-80a

 Lutterbach et al., Germany [27]

Retrospective

1998–2003

500

–

91

–

 Current Study

Retrospective

2017

73

–

90 – 97a

 

Breast

 English et al., England [31]

Prospective

2007

210

289

_

93

 Pattanasri et al., Australia [32]

Retrospective

2010 & 2014

375

–

82

–

 Rajan et al., England [30]

Retrospective

2009–2011

705

3230

_

92

 Samarasinghe et al., Australia [33]

Retrospective

2011–2016

925

2599

92

96

 Current Study

Retrospective

2017

126

–

87 – 97a

 

Colorectal

 Au-Yeung et al., Australia [13]

Retrospective

2010

37

–

89

 

 Alfarhan et al., Saudi Arabia [5]

Retrospective

2013

104b

158

–

87

 Munro et al., Scotland [17]

Retrospective

2006–2007

513

–

80

–

 Wood et al., England [28]

Prospective

2005–2006

157

201

_

90

 Current Study

Retrospective

2017

79

–

75 – 89a

 

Upper Gastrointestinal

 Au-Yeung et al., Australia [13]

Retrospective

2010

37

–

92

 

 Blazeby et al., England [21]

Prospective

2003–2004

273

271

–

85

 Bumm et al., Germany [22]

Retrospective

1999–2006

730

807

 

96

 Goolam-Hossen et al., England [23]

Retrospective

2006

363

–

81

–

 Gashin et al., USA [39]

Retrospective

2009–2010

137c

419

34

65

 Current study

Retrospective

2017

108

–

80 – 94a

 

Genitourinary

 Au-Yeung et al., Australia [13]

Retrospective

2010

86

–

99

 

 Current Study

Retrospective

2017

53

–

68–89

 

Gynaecological

 Current Study

Retrospective

 

67

–

78 – 97a

 

Head and Neck

 Brunner et al., Australia [6]

Prospective

2011–2012

158

–

84

–

 Hollunder et al., Germany [20]

Retrospective

2014–2016

812

1319

 

70-82a

 Current Study

Retrospective

2017

84

 

80 – 92a

 

Lung

 Leo et al., France [25]

Prospective

2003–2004

344

–

96

–

 Loh et al., New Zealand [26]

Retrospective

2009

110

–

71

–

 Osarogiagbon et al., USA [24]

Retrospective

2006–2009

376

454

63

62

 Ung et al., Australia [7]

Prospective

2011

65

–

72

–

 Current Study

Retrospective

2017

142

–

73 – 85a

–

Skin

 Caudron et al., France [10]

Retrospective

2006–2007

228

309

–

80 – 88a

 Current Study

Retrospective

2017

39

–

82 – 95a

 

Multiple Tumour Sites

 De leso et al., England [19]

Retrospective

2010

551d

–

91

–

 Hollunder et al., Germany [20]

Retrospective

2014–2016

2450e

3815

 

66-80a

 Schmidt et al., USA [4]

Prospective

2010–2012

587f

843

98g

–

 Current Study

Retrospective

2017

771

 

79 – 92a

–

  1. aLowest figure is “fully concordant’ and highest figure is ‘fully and partially concordant’
  2. bIncluded all GI cancers but majority (63%) colorectal
  3. cOnly included hepatocellular carcinoma
  4. dIncluded 14 adult cancer MDMs
  5. eIncluded neurooncology, head and neck cancers and musculoskeletal tumours
  6. fIncluded lung and oesophagus cancers
  7. gConcordance data only available in 52% of patients treated at single institution