Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of the measurement model for the constructs of PsyCap, IMOC, IIB, and OC

From: Fostering innovative behavior in health organizations: a PLS-SEM analysis of Norwegian hospital employees

   Convergent validity Internal consistency reliability Discriminant validity
Latent variable Claims label Indicator reliability AVE Composite reliability Cronbach’s alpha HTMT criterion
Rule of thumb   Loading > 0.7 > 0.5 0.7–0.95 0.7–0.95 HTMT interval does not include 1
PsyCap PsyCap1 0.82 0.74 0.92 0.88 Yes
PsyCap2 0.82
PsyCap3 0.89
PsyCap4 0.90
IMOC IMOC1 0.84 0.73 0.95 0.94 Yes
IMOC2 0.76
IMOC3 0.89
IMOC4 0.86
IMOC5 0.90
IMOC6 0.84
IMOC7 0.83
IMOC8 0.90
IIB IIB1 0.85 0.77 0.94 0.92 Yes
IIB2 0.88
IIB3 0.90
IIB4 0.88
IIB5 0.87
OC OC1 0.85 0.72 0.93 0.90 Yes
OC2 0.88
OC3 0.84
OC4 0.85
OC5 0.83
  1. Note: *AVE Average variance extracted, HTMT Heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations