Fostering innovative behavior in health organizations: a PLS-SEM analysis of Norwegian hospital employees

Table 3 Results of the measurement model for the constructs of PsyCap, IMOC, IIB, and OC

		Convergent validity		Internal consistency reliability		Discriminant validity
Latent variable	Claims label	Indicator reliability	AVE	Composite reliability	Cronbach’s alpha	HTMT criterion
Rule of thumb		Loading > 0.7	> 0.5	0.7–0.95	0.7–0.95	HTMT interval does not include 1
PsyCap	PsyCap1	0.82	0.74	0.92	0.88	Yes
	PsyCap2	0.82
	PsyCap3	0.89
	PsyCap4	0.90
IMOC	IMOC1	0.84	0.73	0.95	0.94	Yes
	IMOC2	0.76
	IMOC3	0.89
	IMOC4	0.86
	IMOC5	0.90
	IMOC6	0.84
	IMOC7	0.83
	IMOC8	0.90
IIB	IIB1	0.85	0.77	0.94	0.92	Yes
	IIB2	0.88
	IIB3	0.90
	IIB4	0.88
	IIB5	0.87
OC	OC1	0.85	0.72	0.93	0.90	Yes
	OC2	0.88
	OC3	0.84
	OC4	0.85
	OC5	0.83

Note: *AVE Average variance extracted, HTMT Heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations

ISSN: 1472-6963