Does organizational vision really matter? An empirical examination of factors related to organizational vision integration among hospital employees

Table 5 Test of mediation effect of OVI and PsyCap

Hypo-thesis	Indirect effect	Mediator	Coeff-icient^a	Bootstrapped bias corrected conf. Int.		Mediator effect^b
H6	PsyCap → CP	OVI	0.032^***	0.017	0.053	Comp-lementary
H8	OA → OVI	PsyCap	0.118^***	0.069	0.165	Comp-lementary
H7	OA → CP	OVI	0.065^***	0.040	0.097	Indirect-only^c
H9	OA → CP	PsyCap	0.313^***	0.259	0.354	Indirect-only^c
^d	OA → PsyCap → OVI → CP	PsyCap/OVI	0.019^***	0.010	0.033
^d	Total indirect effect OA → CP		0.398^***	0.351	0.435

^a *** p < 0.01 is the significance level
^b The PLS-SEM mediation analysis and classification of mediation effects are based on Zhao et al. [48] and Nitzl et al. [49]
^c The direct effect between OA and CP is not specified on our conceptual model. However, we estimated also a model included this direct effect, and found the direct effect OA ➔ CP not statistically significant (β = 0.054, p = 0.21). Based on that, in the mediation classification framework by Zhao et al. [48] and Nitzl et al. (2016), a significant indirect effect and insignificant direct effect imply indirect-only/full mediation
^d These two effects ((OA ➔ PsyCap ➔ OVI ➔ CP) and (Total indirect effect OA ➔ CP)) are not an direct part of our analysis, but included to report all possible effects in our conceptual model

ISSN: 1472-6963