Study | Country | IR Framework | Study design | IR approach | Target actors/participants | Reported facilitators/barriers | Targeted UHC outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adamu 2019 [50] | Nigeria | TDF | Qualitative | Pre-implementation use of IR to guide the implementation of a quality improvement programme for improving routine childhood immunisation services | Parents and caregivers of children attending primary health care facilities | Facilitators: Perceived benefits of vaccines and adequate communication of benefits Barriers: inadequate knowledge of the vaccines, non-screening of home-based records, health worker’s refusal to offer immunization services, and husband’s refusal due to socio-cultural beliefs | To reduce missed opportunities for vaccination and improve routine childhood immunisation coverage |
Adamu 2020 [51] | Nigeria | CFIR | Mixed methods | IR used to guide data collection, data analysis and post-implementation evaluation of routine childhood immunisation services | Primary health care facility staff | Facilitators: Intervention flexibility, self-efficacy among health workers, health workers’ confidence in the intervention, services integration. Barriers: Vaccine stock out, faulty cold chain infrastructure, lack of incentives, and socio-cultural beliefs | Improved access to routine childhood immunisation services |
Anaba 2019 [52] | Ghana | NPT | Quantitative | IR used to guide data collection, data analysis and post-implementation evaluation of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) practices among health workers | Health workers | Facilitators: three or more years of experience, clarity on the benefits, availability of innovation champions or initiators and readiness for change practices Barriers: poor monitoring | Optimised intention to use mRDT in the diagnosis of malaria |
Barac 2018 [53] | Multi-country, including Nigeria and South Africa | CFIR | Mixed methods | IR used to guide data collection, data analysis and post-implementation evaluation of typhoid control interventions | Organisations involved in implementation; Health policy and health system leaders at national or subnational levels | Facilitators: Use of multiple implementation strategies to target behaviour change. Barriers: Limited resources and planning, habitual behaviours and cultural practices. | Better understanding of the effectiveness of typhoid control interventions |
Bardosh 2017 [54] | Multi-country, including Kenya | CFIR | Qualitative | IR-oriented mid-implementation and evaluation of a mobile health (mHealth) intervention. | Health care workers, research team members, and community members | Facilitators: Perceived positive impact on patients Barriers: Illiteracy, stigma and, patients’ lack of phone making contact difficult | Improved HIV and Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health (MNCH) service delivery. |
Cole 2018 [55] | Mozambique | CFIR | Mixed methods | IR used to guide post-implementation evaluation of a maternal health programme. | Health providers in facilities involved in implementation; Patients benefiting from intervention | Facilitators: Programme adaptability, shared perceives and collective goals among stakeholders. Barriers: use of volunteer-based implementation with actors outside of the formal health system, with limited retention.. | To explore the contextual factors that may have contributed to observed increases in skilled birth attendance. |
Cooke 2019 [56] | Tanzania | CFIR | Qualitative | IR-oriented implementation and evaluation of an integrated anti-retroviral therapy and opioid treatment programme. | Patients benefiting from intervention; Health providers in facilities involved in implementation | Facilitators: Clearly understood roles among stakeholders and programme adaptability Barriers: lack of space for patient confidentiality and stigma | To understand the contextual factors that influence the effectiveness of integrated methadone and anti-retroviral therapy implementation |
Eboreime 2018 [57] | Nigeria | QIF | Qualitative | IR used to guide post-implementation evaluation of a primary health care system improvement intervention. | Primary health care programme managers | Facilitators: Adequate pre-intervention planning and stakeholder engagement Barriers: Inadequate stakeholder engagements and poor fidelity to planned implementation processes | To identify factors influencing the implementation of a primary health care quality improvement programme. |
Eboreime 2019 [58] | Nigeria | MUSIQ | Mixed methods | IR used to guide post-implementation evaluation of a primary health care system improvement intervention. | Primary health care programme managers | Facilitators: Subnational political will Barriers: suboptimal subnational government leadership, management, financial and technical support | To identify factors influencing a primary health care quality improvement programme’s implementation outcomes |
English 2013 [59] | Kenya | CFIR and TDF | Qualitative | IR-oriented pre-implementation evaluation of a child health programme. | Organisations involved in implementation | Facilitators: peer pressure, clear communications, provision of feedback, development of a learning climate, leadership engagement, enhancement of self-efficacy Barriers: knowledge and skills of personnel | To develop a system-oriented intervention to improve services for children in district hospitals |
Finocchario-Kessler 2015 [60] | Kenya | Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) model | Quantitative | Using programme data to guide post-implementation evaluation and contextualising lessons learnt. | Mother-infant pairs utilising EID services and government health care providers and lab personnel | Facilitators: Strong and sustained collaborations with stakeholders improve the quality and reach of eHealth public health interventions. Barriers: Local leadership and resource constraints. | Improve HIV early infant diagnosis (EID) |
Gimbel 2016 [61] | Multi-country, including Mozambique, Kenya, Cote d’Ivoire | CFIR | Qualitative | IR-oriented post-implementation evaluation of a mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT) and paediatric HIV programme | Organisations involved in implementation | Facilitators: communication, available resources, external change agents, executing, and reflecting and evaluating Barriers: Resistance from the lead nurse | To define the core and adaptable components of a facility-based intervention to address implementation challenges in prevention of mother to child transmission (PMTCT), and identify contextual influences that explain implementation heterogeneity |
Gimbel 2017 [62] | Multi-country, including Mozambique, Rwanda, and Zambia | CFIR | Mixed methods | IR-oriented post-implementation evaluation of data quality assessment and improvement activities within the PHIT programmes | Organisations involved in implementation | Facilitators: intervention components that aligned with user priorities and government systems and the use of evidence to justify intervention to stakeholders. Barriers: Lack of support from District Health Office | To improve aaccess to comprehensive, accurate data to guide resource allocation and programmatic improvement efforts |
Jones 2018 [63] | Zambia | CFIR | Mixed methods | IR-oriented mid-implementation evaluation of a voluntary male medical circumcision programme | Lay counsellors and nursing staff | Facilitators: Performance evaluation with remedial feedback | Increased acceptability and uptake of voluntary male medical circumcision |
Maruma 2018 [64] | South Africa | TFA | Mixed methods | IR-oriented post-implementation evaluation of data collection by community health workers for tuberculosis contact tracing | CHWs | Facilitators: Feedback through pre-and post-assessmentsg. Barriers: Inadequate training, lack of community acceptance and resource constraints. | To determine factors influencing the collection of information by community health workers for tuberculosis contact tracing |
McRobie 2017 [65] | Uganda | CFIR | Mixed methods | IR-oriented pre-implementation evaluation of HIV testing, care and treatment policy implementation | Health providers in facilities involved in implementation | Facilitators: donor investment and support, strong scientific evidence, low policy complexity, phased implementation and effective planning. Barriers: Limited human resources, infrastructure and health management information systems. | To assess implementation of national HIV policies regarding testing, treatment, and retention at health facilities serving two health and demographic surveillance sites |
Nabyonga-Orem 2014 [66] | Uganda | (MRT) | Mixed methods | IR-oriented post-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitating factors to the uptake of evidence in the process of user fee abolition | Donors, policymakers, researchers, civil society, journalist, private service provider | Facilitators: The political window and alignment of the evidence with overall government discourse enhanced uptake of evidence | Uptake of evidence in the process of user fee abolition |
Naidoo 2018 [67] | South Africa | CFIR | Qualitative | IR-oriented post-implementation evaluation of community-based HIV programmes | Community members, CHWs, team leaders, facility staff, community leaders, and social workers | Facilitators: networking and peer-support, recognition of the CHWs by the government, standardised training. Barriers: Limited space and infrastructure for CHWs to work in. | To explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of community-based HIV programmes in order to produce actionable findings to improve them |
Newman-Owiredu 2017 [68] | Multi-country, including Malawi, Nigeria, and Zimbabwe | NR | Mixed methods | IR-oriented post-implementation review of HIV (PMTCT) implementation capacity building activities | Health care workers, research team members, and community members support staff (Expert Mothers/Mother Mentors/Mother Support Groups) | Facilitators: financial incentives offered as part of national training exercises. Barriers: health workers’ perception of research as additional work rather than an opportunity to learn or develop professionally. | Scaling up Option B+ antiretroviral treatment and retention in care. |
Petersen Williams 2015 [69] | South Africa | CFIR | Qualitative | Use of IR for pre-implementation design of a screening, referral and treatment programme for substance use among women receiving antenatal care | Health providers in facilities involved in implementation | Facilitators: training, adequate support, guidance, and mentoring. Barriers: intervention being considered as additional work, lack of interest from staff, time constraints, staff shortages, overburdened workloads, and language barriers. | To investigate health care providers’ perceptions of the acceptability and feasibility of providing screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment to address maternal substance use among pregnant women attending antenatal care |
Rodriguez 2017 [70] | South Africa | CFIR | Qualitative | Qualitative interviews, focus groups discussions, workshop with district directors, clinic leaders, staff, and patients. Prospective programme evaluation. | Health providers in facilities involved in implementation; health policy and health system leaders at national or subnational levels; patients benefiting from intervention | Facilitators: Leader support, and employee readiness and motivation Barriers: Hierarchical relationships between staff | To identify barriers and facilitators in the implementation, uptake, and sustainability of PMTCT protocols in a rural areas |
Rodriguez 2019 [71] | Zambia | CFIR | Mixed-methods | Quantitative and qualitative evaluations of organisational, burnout, and organisational readiness functioning and barriers to implementation. | Health care providers | Facilitators: community engagement, leadership support, employee readiness and motivation. Barriers: Resource constraints and poor communication of programme benefits. | Uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision |
Soi 2018 [72] | Mozambique | CFIR | Qualitative | IR-oriented post-implementation evaluation of the scale-up of an human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programmes | Health providers and educators in facilities and schools involved in implementation; health and education policy and health system leaders at national or subnational levels | Facilitators: Health workers’ beliefs in importance of vaccines and an organisational culture of making personal sacrifice for immunisation, advocacy and social mobilisation through the right opinion leaders and champions Barriers: weak infrastructural characteristics and insufficient organisational incentives | To identify implementation barriers and facilitators affecting the scale-up of HPV vaccination in Mozambique |
Warren 2017 [73] | Kenya | CFIR | Qualitative | Using IR an analytical lens for post-implementation evaluation of a complex, multifaceted maternal health programme | Community, facility (nurses and midwives), and policy stakeholders (ministry of health), Federation of Women’s Lawyers - FIDA | Facilitators: individual champions, Collaboration with civil-society organisations like FIDA | To address the causes of mistreatment during childbirth and promote respectful maternity care |
White 2019 [74] | Benin | CFIR | Mixed methods | IR used to guide mid- implementation evaluation of a quality improvement programme as well as the contextualisation of evaluation findings. | Health providers in facilities involved in implementation | Facilitators: Surgical enthusiasm, self-efficacy and motivation, in-depth stakeholder engagement at multiple levels Barriers: Staff viewed the checklist as irrelevant or a waste of time and leadership appeared arrogant. | To measure the sustainability of surgical safety checklist use and to evaluate the acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility and fidelity of nationwide checklist implementation, including penetration of the checklist into operating room culture |
Zitti 2019 [75] | Mali | CFIR | Qualitative | IR used to guide post-implementation evaluation of a pilot performance based healthcare financing programme | Health facility staff and managers | Facilitators: Implementing a pilot project and good leadership | Gaining contextual understanding of performance-based healthcare financing. |