From: Learning health systems using data to drive healthcare improvement and impact: a systematic review
 | LHS | Study | GRADE Level of Evidence | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ePRO Duke cancer clinics LHS | [19] | Observational, case series pre/post outcomes | low | Â |
2 | Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) | [20] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
3 | ImproveCareNow Chronic Care Network | [21] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
[22] | Qualitative case evaluation, examining LHS user interaction, technology, content management, and community engagement | ? | Qualitative evaluation | ||
4 | NUCATS Institute LHS | [24] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
[25] | Observational, case series | low | Â | ||
[23] | RCT | high | Â | ||
[26] | Observational, case series | low | Â | ||
5 | Ottawa Hospital Lung Cancer LHS | [28] | Observational, case series pre/post outcomes | low | Â |
[27] | Observational, case series pre/post outcomes | low | Â | ||
6 | PEDS-CHOIR | [29] | Observational, cross-sectional cases | low | Â |
7 | University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, USA | [30] | Improvements stated, no figures provided | 0 | No figures provided |
8 | ePPOC | [31] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
9 | Community Health Applied Research Network (CHARN) | [33] | Qualitative evaluation of the adoption, expansion, and diffusion of the national LHS model | ? | Qualitative evaluation |
[32] | Observational, cross-sectional cases, other improvements stated but no figures reported | low | Â | ||
10 | KPNC 30 primary care practices at 13 medical facilities across four counties | [34] | Pragmatic, provider-randomized, multi-site clinical trial | high | Â |
11 | Connected Health Cities | [35] | Correspondence article in journal | 0 | Grey literature |
[61] | Final report, observational, case studies reported | 0 | Grey literature | ||
12 | PCORnet® | [38] | Interrupted time series without parallel control | low |  |
[39] | Two of more single arms | low | Â | ||
[36] | RCT, large multisite | high | Â | ||
[37] | RCT, large multisite | high | Â | ||
13 | Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register | [40] | Improvements stated, no figures provided | 0 | No figures provided |
[42] | Observational, 3 case descriptions provided | low | Â | ||
[41] | Observational, case series | low | Â | ||
14 | University of Wisconsin Health LHS | [46] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
[44] | Interrupted time series without parallel control | low | Â | ||
[43] | Cluster RCT, 4 sites | high | Â | ||
[45] | Observational, case series pre/post outcomes | low | Â | ||
15 | Wound Care LHS | [48] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
[47] | Observational, case series | low | Â | ||
16 | Alberta Strategic Clinical Networks | [50] | Observational, case series pre/post outcomes | low | Â |
[49] | Observational, case series pre/post outcomes. Thematic analysis on documents & interviews | low | Mixed-methods | ||
17 | Geisinger Health Systems LHS | [51] | Improvements stated, no figures provided | 0 | No figures provided |
18 | Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry | [52] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
19 | Kaiser Permanente Northern California | [53] | Interrupted time series without parallel control | low | Â |
[54] | Observational, case series pre/post outcomes | low | Â | ||
20 | Distributed Ambulatory Research in Therapeutics Network (DARTNet) | [55] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
21 | Optum Labs LHS | [56] | Improvements stated, no figures provided | 0 | No figures provided |
[57] | Comparative study with concurrent controls | medium | Â | ||
[58] | Observational, case series | low | Â | ||
23 | IDEA4PS | [59] | Observational, case series | low | Â |
[60] | Observational, case series pre/post outcomes. Ethnography and interviews | low | Mixed-methods |