Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of Random effects probit model for patient DCE full analysis, and subgroup analysis by time of diagnosis

From: Discrete choice experiment for eliciting preference for health services for patients with ALS and their informal caregivers

Attribute

Full Analysis

Coefficient (95% Confidence Interval)

Subgroup Analysis

Diagnosis ≤ 6 months

Coefficient (95% Confidence Interval)

Diagnosis > 6 months

Coefficient (95% Confidence Interval)

Intercept

-0.21 (−0.49, 0.07)

− 0.44 (−1.03, 0.13)

− 0.08 (− 0.39, 0.23)

Reference level

 A1. I would get all the information about motor neuron disease at the time of diagnosis

  A2. I would get all information about motor neuron disease when I think I will need it

−0.22 (− 0.44, − 0.01)

−0.21 (− 0.67, 0.24)

−0.25 (− 0.50, − 0.01)

  A3. I don’t want to know anything about motor neuron disease at any time

− 0.18 (− 0.40, 0.05)

− 0.19 (− 0.65, 0.27)

−0.24 (− 0.50, 0.01)

B. Price of additional services

− 0.00 (− 0.00, 0.00)

0.00 (− 0.01, 0.01)

0.00 (− 0.01, 0.00)

Reference level

 C1. I would get regular visits from community multidisciplinary team (for e.g. physiotherapy, occupational therapist) and the public health nurse in my home

  C2. I would arrange multidisciplinary team (for e.g. physiotherapy, occupational therapist) and public health nurse visits as I need in my home

0.07 (−0.08, 0.22)

0.05 (− 0.26, 0.35)

0.02 (− 0.16, 0.19)

Reference level

 D1. I would attend Multidisciplinary team MND specialist clinic no matter how far away

  D2. I would just attend a local Neurology clinic

−0.11 (− 0.31, 0.08)

− 0.14 (− 0.55, 0.26)

−0.01 (− 0.23, 0.22)

Reference level

 E1. I would be prepared to go to a multidisciplinary clinic with long waiting times in the clinic to see more than one professional

  E2. I would not be prepared to go to a multidisciplinary clinic with long waiting times in the clinic to see more than one professional

0.04 (−0.13, 0.22)

0.27 (−0.09, 0.64)

0.00 (− 0.20, 0.20)

Reference level

 F1. No matter what I would like to receive all my care at home

  F2. I would receive care in a hospital or a hospice as an inpatient

−0.05 (− 0.20, 0.11)

−0.08 (− 0.24, 0.04)

−0.06 (− 0.24, 0.12)

Reference level

 G1. The doctors advise and help me when I need treatments including ventilation and stomach tube

  G2. The doctors advise me, and I would decide what treatments I get including ventilation and stomach tube

−0.11 (− 0.26, 0.03)

−0.35 (− 0.67, − 0.05)

−0.07 (− 0.23, 0.10)

Reference level

 H1. Personal care in the home is provided to me by someone who is not a relative or friend

  H2. Personal care in the home is provided by a relative or friend

−0.04 (− 0.23, 0.16)

−0.28 (− 0.73, 0.17)

0.00 (− 0.22, 0.22)

Reference level

 I1. I would start to see the Hospice Care team early on in my illness

  I2. I would start to see the Hospice Care team when something serious happens later in my illness

0.16 (0.02, 0.30)

0.21 (− 0.10, 0.51)

0.13 (− 0.03, 0.29)

Reference level

 J1. I would use new communication technology including voice banking

  J2. I would not use new communication technology including voice banking

−0.14 (− 0.29, − 0.00)

−0.01 (− 0.33, 0.30)

−0.17 (− 0.33, − 0.00)

Reference level

 K1. Phone advice is not available

  K2. Phone advice is available 24 h a day

0.04 (− 0.16, 0.23)

−0.06 (− 0.47, 0.34)

0.00 (− 0.22, 0.22)

  K3. Phone advice is available during the hours of 9 am – 5 pm Monday to Friday

−0.09 (− 0.24, 0.05)

−0.05 (− 0.35, 0.24)

−0.11 (− 0.28, 0.05)

Reference level

 L1. Emotional support is not provided

  L2. Emotional support is provided by group meetings with other MND caregivers

0.04 (−0.15, 0.23)

0.03 (− 0.15, 0.20)

0.01 (− 0.21, 0.24)

  L3. Emotional support is provided from a counselor

0.02 (−0.13, 0.17)

0.03 (− 0.30, 0.36)

0.03 (− 0.15, 0.20)

Reference level

 M1. I would have healthcare professionals who I can depend on

  M2. I would not necessarily need healthcare professionals to depend on

0.10 (−0.08, 0.28)

0.42 (0.02, 0.83)

0.09 (−0.12, 0.30)

Site of Onset

−0.07 (− 0.28, 0.13)

−0.2 (− 0.64, 0.24)

−0.09 (− 0.34, 0.16)

Time Since Diagnosis

− 0.01 (− 0.24, 0.21)

–

–

Sex

− 0.04 (− 0.24, 0.14)

0.39 (− 0.25, 0.73)

−0.12 (− 0.35, 0.09)

Kings Staging

0.13 (− 0.08, 0.34)

0.24 (− 0.25, 0.73)

0.00 (− 0.24, 0.25)

Rho-squared

0.13

0.2

0.1

Adjusted rho-squared

0.09

0.08

0.07

  1. The magnitude of the coefficient is related to the tendency for participants to choose that attribute level. The magnitude of attribute coefficients and their associated 95% confidence interval were used as an indicator of the strength of participant preferences