From: Approaches to the rationalization of surgical instrument trays: scoping review and research agenda
Approach | Author | Technique | Reduction | Approach | Author | Technique | Reduction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AE | [4] | CL, OBS, STD | 48.00% | AE | [53] | CL, OBS | 39.50% |
AE | [10] | FG, OBS, CA, CT, CP | 61.00% | AE | [54] | CL, FG | 57.00% |
AE | [15] | STD, PC, CL, OBS, FG | NR | AE | [55] | CL | 51.92% |
AE | [17] | CT | NR | AE | [64] | FG, SM, SIT | 33.33% |
AE | [18] | CT, PDSA, FG, RCA, KDD | 38.60% | AE | [65] | PC, FG, CL | 63.74% |
AE | [19] | STD | NR | AE | [66] | CL, STD | NR |
AE | [21] | CL, FG | 19.10% | AE | [67] | STD, PC, OBS | NR |
AE | [35]* | ABC, PSI, ITV | 66.67% | AE | [68] | STD, PC, FG | NR |
AE | [36] | FG, CL | 30.00% | AE | [69] | CL, STD | 63.27% |
AE | [37] | PSI, OBS | 50.00% | AE | [70] | CT | NR |
AE | [38] | OBS, ITV, CL, CA | 13.50% | PL | [6] | FG, CAN, SOP, CL | 10.78% |
AE | [39] | FG, OBS, PSI | 62.11% | PL | [16] | CAN, KAI | 11.00% |
AE | [40]* | CL, PSI | 66.67% | PL | [20] | CL, OBS, STD, KAI | 41.45% |
AE | [41]* | PSI | 62.50% | PL | [22] | FG, CL, SXS | 9.86% |
AE | [42]* | PSI | 54.55% | PL | [26] | STD, PC, CL, OBS, FG | 76.87% |
AE | [43] | PSI | 54.55% | PL | [56] | OSW, SIT, KAI | NR |
AE | [44]* | TDI | 57.14% | PL | [57] | VSM, L5S, STD, OBS, KAI, FG, CL | 70.56% |
AE | [45]* | TDI, DT | 42.86% | PL | [58] | SXS, FG, VSM, KAI, OSW, CL, STD | 53.85% |
AE | [46] | OBS, STD, FG, BRT, CL | 62.30% | PL | [59] | STD, FG, CL | 58.74% |
AE | [47] | CT | 58.00% | MP | [1] | MILP, HEU, PC | NR |
AE | [48] | OBS, CL, CA | 46.67% | MP | [12] | PLM, HEU | NR |
AE | [49] | CL, STD | 89.00% | MP | [34] | CL, HEU, NIP, CP | NR |
AE | [51] | PC, CL, FG | NR | MP | [61] | PLM, HEU | 61.59% |
AE | [52] | NG, PF, RCA, FG, SOP, CL | 20.00% | MP | [63] | BRT, OBS, FG, CAN, LP | 13.10% |