Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Results of a patient-oriented second opinion program in Germany shows a high discrepancy between initial therapy recommendation and second opinion

Original Submission
3 Jul 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jan Weyerstraß
12 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jan Weyerstraß
18 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jutta Hüebner
10 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
30 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jutta Hüebner
15 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Aug 2019 Author responded Author comments - Jan Weyerstraß
18 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 3
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Aug 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Feb 2020 Author responded Author comments - Jan Weyerstraß
5 Dec 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dominik Ose
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Feb 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Feb 2020 Author responded Author comments - Jan Weyerstraß
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Feb 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Feb 2020 Editorially accepted
20 Mar 2020 Article published 10.1186/s12913-020-5060-7

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\