Skip to main content

Table 3 Studies examining disparities in participation or attrition from SM interventions, stratified by quality1.

From: What impact do chronic disease self-management support interventions have on health inequity gaps related to socioeconomic status: a systematic review

Author2

Country and setting

Study Design

Chronic Disease

Sample size

Intervention

Variables measured

Results

Quality rating

Poduval 2018 (Murray 2017)

UK Urban public primary care practices

Subgroup analysis of RCT

Diabetes

299 (intervention group)

Comparing 2 internet SM programmes +/− support Predictors of use

Gender, age, ethnicity, education.

No difference in frequency of programme use or registration according to any demographic predictors. User characteristics were reflective of the overall target population of the area.

JBI 12/12

S/O 10/11

Thorn 2011 (Day 2010)

USA Rural public primary care practices

Subgroup analysis of RCT

Chronic pain

109

Low-literacy pain SM (education and CBT) groups. Drop-out predictors

Demographics, literacy, pain catastrophising, disability, depression, QOL, pain intensity/interference.

Dropout before programme started was associated with low education (p < 0.02), low literacy (p < 0.05) and catastrophising (p < 0.01); failure to complete programme associated with income (under/over $13,000 – p < 0.01) and low education (p < 0.02).

JBI 12/12

S/O 9/11

Dattalo 2012 (Boult 2011)

USA Primary care (both insured and public patients)

Subgroup analysis of RCT

Multimorbid chronic disease

241

Stanford CDSMP Completion predictors

Demographics, health status, health activities, patient activation, patient-rated quality of care.

22.8% of eligible adults completed (attended at least 5 of 6 sessions). Attendance was associated with dissatisfaction with GP (OR = 2.8) and having higher SF-36 physical health scores (OR = 2.3). Age, sex, education, race and SES were not significant.

JBI 11/12

S/O 5/11

Cauch-Dudek 2014

Canada National database analysis

Cohort

Diabetes –first 8/12 post diagnosis

46,553

Any type of DSME Participation predictors

Age, sex, immigrant status, comorbidity, mental illness, rural residence, SES

22% of people attended DSME within 8/12 of diagnosis. Non- attendance was associated with older age, lower SES, recent immigration or physical/mental health comorbidity (all p < 0.001).

JBI 10/11

Adjei-Boakye 2018

USA National telephone survey

Cross-sectional

Diabetes

84,179

Any type of diabetes SM education (DSME) Participation predictors

Race, education, marital status, income, sex, health insurance, BMI, insulin use, self-care behaviour.

53.7% reported attending DSME, with attendance less likely amongst men (adjusted OR = 0.85), Hispanics (aOR = 0.81), high school only (aOR = 0.71) or less than high school educated (aOR = 0.51), income <$15,000 (aOR = 0.70) or < $25,000 (aOR = 0.81) and the uninsured (aOR = 0.87). Attending DSME was significantly associated with adherence to SM behaviours.

JBI 8/8

Glasgow 2018

USA Database analysis (health insurance organisation)

Cross-sectional

Diabetes

2603

Internet SM programme Participation predictors

Socio-demographics, reason for declining service, HbA1c BP, BMI, lipids, SF36, ADL, number of comorbidities

Participants were likely to be younger (p = 0.041); not Latino (p = 0.002); earning >$30,000 (p < 0.0001), greater than high school educated (p < 0.0001), non-smokers (p < 0.0001) with lower blood pressure (p = 0.028). Self-selected participants were the most likely to be white, better educated and healthier.

JBI 8/8

Horrell 2017

USA National database analysis

Cross-sectional

Multimorbid chronic disease

19,365

Stanford CDSMP Participation and completion predictors

Enrolment and completion of CDSMP compared to high/low SES area

83.6% of participants lived in the least impoverished areas (< 25% of population below poverty line) and 0.3% of participants lived in the most impoverished areas (> 50% below poverty line). SE area was significantly correlated with ethnicity and education level. Course completion was not associated with SES – poorer people had a higher (but non-significant) completion rate.

JBI 8/8

Hardman 2018

Australia Rural community health centre

Cross-sectional

Chronic pain

186

Tailored pain SM Drop-out predictors

Demographics, self-efficacy, pain catastrophising, opioid dose, comorbidities.

Early dropout associated with social stressors (p = 0.002/0.029, OR = 0.08/0.30); pain causal beliefs (p = 0.005, OR = 5.01) and pain catastrophising (p = 0.048, OR = 1.03) Low income significant in bivariate analysis (p = 0.011) only.

JBI 8/8

Kure-Beigel 2016

Denmark Urban community health centre

Mixed:Cross-sectional + qualitative

Diabetes, COPD or CVD

104

Tailored SMS Drop-out predictors

Education, age, gender, cohabitation, whether 1st meeting cancelled.

Non-completion associated with younger age (below 60) (p = 0.03, OR = 3.38). Non-significant trend of lower education associated with lack of completion. Qualitative study suggested comorbidity and low job control in low educated were factors.

JBI 8/8

Santorelli 2017

USA State-wide telephone survey (New Jersey)

Cross-sectional

Diabetes

4358

Any type of DSME Participation predictors

Age, sex, race, income.

42% reported attending DSME, with attendance less likely amongst lower educated (high school or less), Hispanic or ‘other’ ethnicity, those diagnosed under 2 years ago (all p < 0.001); the uninsured (p < 0.004) and those without a HCP visit for diabetes in the past year (p < 0.002). DSME attendance was not correlated to the number of certified DSME courses available in the area.

JBI 6/8

  1. 1Studies listed in order of quality as measured by Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) criteria [30] and Sun/Oxman (S/O) subgroup analysis (for RCTs) criteria [27, 28]. RCTs listed first, followed by cohort and cross-sectional studies.
  2. 2Includes additional studies from the same research group where supplementary information was obtained.