Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The role of professional logics in quality register use: a realist evaluation

Original Submission
18 Jan 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
30 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Charlott Norman
17 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene Nelson
3 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katarina Steen Carlsson
22 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John McNeil
Resubmission - Version 2
30 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Nov 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Charlott Norman
7 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eugene Nelson
27 Oct 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katarina Steen Carlsson
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Nov 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Dec 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Charlott Norman
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Dec 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Jan 2020 Author responded Author comments - Ann-Charlott Norman
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Jan 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Jan 2020 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2020 Article published 10.1186/s12913-020-4944-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page
\