Table 5 Multiple ordinal regression model for patient-reported admission helpfulness and nominal regression model for improvement during admission (n = 424)
From: Patient-controlled admission contracts: a longitudinal study of patient evaluations
Covariate | Ordinal regression model for the admission helpfulness | Nominal regression model for patient reported improvement during the admissiona | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No, don’t feel better | Yes, somewhat better | Yes, a good deal better | ||||||
OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | OR (95% CI) | p-value | |
Age group | ||||||||
20-29 | 0.61 (0.15; 2.43) | 0.485 | 0.10 (0.01; 1.47) | 0.093 | 0.72 (0.13; 4.16) | 0.714 | 0.27 (0.05; 1.39) | 0.117 |
30-39 | 0.72 (0.22; 2.38) | 0.591 | 0.91 (0.14; 5.89) | 0.921 | 0.79 (0.18; 3.49) | 0.758 | 0.31 (0.08; 1.21) | 0.091 |
40-49 | 0.77 (0.28; 2.12) | 0.615 | 5.53 (1.10; 27.84) | 0.038 | 1.57 (0.39; 6.27) | 0.520 | 0.68 (0.19; 2.40) | 0.551 |
50-59 – ref | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
60+ | 0.32 (0.07; 1.54) | 0.157 | 5.19 (0.31; 86.77) | 0.250 | 5.30 (0.63; 44.81) | 0.125 | 0.13 (0.01; 1.96) | 0.141 |
Sex, Male | 1.04 (0.49; 2.22) | 0.913 | 1.07 (0.35; 3.26) | 0.904 | 1.94 (0.75; 5.04) | 0.172 | 1.65 (0.69; 3.96) | 0.260 |
Living alone, dichotomized – ref “yes” | 1.21 (0.44; 3.34) | 0.719 | 0.11 (0.02; 0.71) | 0.021 | 0.33 (0.09; 1.15) | 0.081 | 0.34 (0.10; 1.15) | 0.083 |
Diagnosis group | ||||||||
Other – ref | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Schizophrenia | 1.75 (0.69; 4.46) | 0.243 | 0.15 (0.03; 0.69) | 0.015 | 0.38 (0.11; 1.27) | 0.115 | 0.98 (0.31; 3.08) | 0.977 |
Bipolar disorder | 1.30 (0.43; 3.89) | 0.643 | 0.13 (0.02; 0.90) | 0.039 | 0.28 (0.07; 1.19) | 0.084 | 0.85 (0.23; 3.10) | 0.805 |
HoNOS mean score | 0.79 (0.35; 1.80) | 0.575 | 1.27 (0.38; 4.23) | 0.694 | 0.60 (0.22; 1.64) | 0.319 | 0.72 (0.29; 1.81) | 0.484 |
Sum of municipal services | 1.00 (0.66; 1.52) | 0.996 | 1.56 (0.79; 3.07) | 0.197 | 0.85 (0.48; 1.51) | 0.581 | 0.87 (0.50; 1.50) | 0.608 |
Other specialist mental health services, dichotomized – ref 1 or 2 | 1.75 (0.74; 4.16) | 0.204 | 0.16 (0.04; 0.73) | 0.018 | 0.33 (0.11; 0.98) | 0.047 | 0.84 (0.30; 2.34) | 0.745 |
Number of patient-controlled admissions | 1.01 (0.95; 1.07) | 0.695 | 1.01 (0.94; 1.09) | 0.791 | 0.99 (0.92; 1.06) | 0.738 | 0.97 (0.91; 1.04) | 0.409 |
How much have you been with others during the stay | ||||||||
I stayed for myself all of time | 0.06 (0.02; 0.19) | <0.001 | 31.11 (2.59; 373.49) | 0.007 | 9.29 (1.27; 67.94) | 0.029 | 0.40 (0.03; 6.00) | 0.507 |
I have been a little together with others | 0.22 (0.11; 0.44) | <0.001 | 27.03 (5.69; 128.46) | <0.001 | 4.08 (1.44; 11.56) | 0.009 | 1.85 (0.68; 5.08) | 0.232 |
Have been partly together with others | 0.42 (0.23; 0.75) | 0.004 | 5.26 (1.35; 20.49) | 0.018 | 2.99 (1.26; 7.06) | 0.014 | 1.84 (0.82; 4.12) | 0.143 |
Have been a lot together with others – ref | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Talks with ward personnel, dichotomized – ref ”yes” | 0.76 (0.45; 1.34) | 0.363 | 0.34 (0.09; 1.30) | 0.116 | 0.70 (0.29; 1.67) | 0.421 | 0.95 (0.41; 2.23) | 0.913 |
Mean push-motivation for admission | 2.46 (1.57; 3.85) | <0.001 | 0.20 (0.07; 0.56) | 0.002 | 0.33 (0.14; 0.78) | 0.012 | 0.51 (0.21; 1.22) | 0.131 |
Mean pull-motivation for admission | 1.58 (1.10; 2.26) | 0.014 | 0.38 (0.18; 0.89) | 0.014 | 0.59 (0.34; 1.05) | 0.073 | 0.75 (0.43; 1.31) | 0.310 |