Skip to main content

Table 4 Validity and reliability properties of rurality measures

From: Systematic scoping review of factors and measures of rurality: toward the development of a rurality index for health care research in Japan

Author and publication year

Name of the index

Reliability measures

Reliability score

Validity measures

Validity score

Department of Primary Industries and Energy, Department of Human Services and Health, 1994 [24]

Rural, remote and metropolitan area (RRMA)

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Weinert et al., 1995 [25]

MSU rurality index

test/re-test

0.94 or larger

concurrent validity (comparison with other measure such as the participants’ perception)

R2 = 0.41, r = 0.85 and Z = 4.09

Leduc, 1997 [26]

General Practice Rurality Index (GPRI)

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Department of Health and Aged Care, 2001 [27]

Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia (ARIA)

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare Canberra, 2004 [28]

Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC)

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Swan et al., 2008 [29]

Clinical peripherality indicator

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Kralj, 2008 [11]

The Rurality Index for Ontario (RIO)

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

McGrail et al., 2009 [30]

the Index of Rural Access

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Han et al., 2012 [31]

Rural PHCWA index

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Humphreys et al., 2012 [13]

six-level geographical classification

not applicable

not applicable

concurrent validity

Steinhaeuser et al., 2014 [32]

modified RRS-Germany (mRRS-G)

Cronbach’s alpha

negative

convergent construct validity

factor analysis: R2 = 59.4%

Mao et al., 2015 [33]

Individual-based rurality and well-being measures

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicabl

Zhu et al., 2015 [34]

Rural taxonomy

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Inagami et al., 2016 [35]

IRR zip

not applicable

not applicable

face validity

not applicable

Alasia et al., 2017 [36]

the index of remoteness

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Calovi et al., 2018 [37]

The spatial accessibility index

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

not applicable

Doogan et al., 2018 [38]

Isolation scale

not applicable

not applicable

Spearman correlation to test convergent validity and the Akaike information criterion for criterion validity

Spearman correlation for convergent validity r = 0.99