Skip to main content

Table 2 Differences between women who saw intervention and control ASHAs in percent who report each person-centered care items, percentages shown unless otherwise stated

From: A mixed-methods evaluation of the impact of a person-centered family planning intervention for community health workers on family planning outcomes in India

 

Intervention, percent of women reporting the two highest responsesa

Control, percent of women reporting the two highest responsesa

 

N

%

N

%

Total

536

100

541

100

PCC score (mean, IQR)

29.30

(28,36)

29.19

(27,35)

ASHA introduced herself when ASHA came (p = 0.0000)

517

96.5

470

86.9

ASHA treated her with respect (p = 0.0000)

520

97

481

88.9

ASHA wanted the best for her (p = 0.0464)

468

87.3

449

83

Given enough information about her care in order to feel like she understood what was happening

423

78.9

420

77.6

ASHA involved her in decisions

410

76.5

409

75.6

ASHA clearly explained things

436

81.3

442

81.7

ASHA answered in a way that she could understand when she had questions

450

84

450

83.2

ASHA supported her anxieties and fears about family planning procedure or method choice

380

70.9

398

73.6

Felt she could ask the ASHA any questions they had

464

86.6

451

83.4

Felt she was allowed to have someone she wanted to stay with her during the visit (p = 0.0366)

390

72.8

362

66.9

Felt the ASHA was available when she want to speak to the ASHA, had questions, or needed support

442

82.5

434

80.2

Felt the ASHA took the best care of her

400

74.6

415

76.7

Felt the ASHA cared about her as a person

447

83.4

454

83.9

Had complete trust in the ASHA with regards to her care

442

82.5

433

80

  1. aTwo highest = “most of the time” or “all of the time” compared to “none of the time” or “some of the time”,