Skip to main content

Table 3 Priority list, preference matching and internship location of successfully matched applicants (2013–16) for Victorian internship

From: Exploring preference for, and uptake of, rural medical internships, a key issue for supporting rural training pathways

 

Victorian-trained domestic graduates (n = 2737)

(Priority Group 1)

Victorian-trained international graduates (n = 262)

(Priority Group 2)

Other graduates (n = 131)

(Priority Group 3)

Total interns (n = 3130)

 

Computer matched (n = 2592)

Through discussion (n = 145)

Computer matched (n = 179)

Through discussion (n = 83)

Through discussion (n = 131)

Overall

Interns’ preference list for hospital/health service

 Total number of preferences: mean (SD)

8.8 (2.9)

8.6 (3.7)

15.0 (4.9)

14.3 (4.5)

11.6 (6.6)

9.4 (3.8)

 Total preferences for metropolitan locations: mean (SD)

7.1 (2.2)

6.7 (2.5)

7.8 (2.2)

7.4 (2.4)

6.3 (3.3)

7.1 (2.3)

 Total preferences for rural locations: mean (SD)

1.7 (2.1)

1.8 (2.3)

7.2 (4.1)

6.9 (4.2)

5.3 (4.8)

2.3 (3.0)

Proportion of rural (MMM 2–5) location preferences as percentage of total preferences

 0%

31.1% (807)

32.4% (47)

5.6% (10)

4.8% (4)

21.4% (28)

28.6% (896)

 1–20%

37.5% (971)

33.8% (49)

7.3% (13)

9.6% (8)

13.0% (17)

33.8% (1058)

 21–50%

25.4% (657)

28.3% (41)

44.7% (80)

47.0% (39)

24.4% (32)

27.1% (849)

 51–100%

6.1% (157)

5.5% (8)

42.5% (76)

38.6% (32)

41.2% (54)

10.5% (327)

Any rural (MMM 2–5) location in top five (5) preferences?

 Yes

20.1% (522)

20.0% (29)

35.2% (63)

32.5% (27)

48.9% (64)

22.5% (705)

 No

79.9% (2070)

80.0% (116)

64.8% (116)

67.5% (56)

51.1% (67)

77.5% (2425)

Any smaller regional or rural town (MMM 3–5) location in top five (5) preferences?

 Yes

8.2% (212)

7.6% (11)

22.9% (41)

18.1% (15)

32.1% (42)

10.3% (321)

 No

91.8% (2380)

92.4% (134)

77.1% (138)

81.9% (68)

67.9% (89)

89.7% (2809)

Candidate’s preference that was matched

 1st preference

51.2% (1327)

 

26.3% (47)

  

43.9% (1374)

 2nd – 3rd preference

25.0% (649)

 

16.2% (29)

  

21.7% (678)

 4th – 5th preference

13.7% (355)

 

15.6% (28)

  

12.2% (383)

 6th or higher preference

10.1% (261)

 

41.9% (75)

  

10.7% (336)

 Not applicable/ no information

145

83

131

11.5% (359)

Accepted internship location

 Metropolitan (MMM-1)

86.3% (2236)

30.3% (44)

53.1% (95)

47.0% (39)

45.8% (60)

79.0% (2474)

 Large regional (MMM-2)

7.8% (203)

19.3% (28)

18.4% (33)

14.5% (12)

22.9% (30)

9.8% (306)

 Smaller regional or rural towns (MMM −3-5)a

5.9% (153)

50.3% (73)

28.5% (51)

38.5% (32)

31.3% (41)

11.2% (350)

aRCIT positions

62

20

18

13

15

128

  1. SD Standard deviation; MMM Modified Monash Model (rurality scale); RCIT Rural community internship training; Priority Group = 3 levels as per definitions in Table 2
  2. a Smaller regional or rural towns (MMM 3–5) includes RCIT positions